Detection of fraudulent financial reporting trough the Crowe’s Fraud Pentagon Theory in primary consumer goods indexed
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the fraud pentagon in detecting fraudulent financial statements. The data was collected by using the documentation method, while the data analysis used was descriptive analysis, classical assumption test, and hypothesis testing. The population in this study were companies IDX Industrial Classification Food and Beverage Sub-Sector listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (BEI) 2016-2019. The sample in this study was 11 companies selected by the purposive sampling method. Based on the multiple linear regression analysis, the results show that opportunity, rationalization, and arrogance have a significant positive effects on fraud detection in Primary Consumer Goods Indexed. This means that rationalization, opportunity, and arrogance can detect fraudulent financial statements. However, the pressure and competence variables have a significance value below 5%. This means that the two variables do not have a significant effect on the detection of fraudulent financial reporting in companies indexed by primary consumer goods in the food and beverage sub-sector.
Downloads
Article Details
Authors who submit a manuscript understand that if the manuscript is accepted for publication, the copyright of the article shall be assigned to Jurnal Ekonomi Modernisasi (JEM).
References
ACFE. (2019). Survai Fraud Indonesia. https://acfeindonesia.or.id/survei-fraud-indonesia/
Agustina, R. D., & Pratomo, D. (2019). Pengaruh fraud pentagon dalam mendeteksi kecurangan pelaporan keuangan. Jurnal Ilmiah MEA (Manajemen, Ekonomi, & Akuntansi), 3(1), 44–62. https://doi.org/10.31955/mea.vol3.iss1.pp44-62
AICPA. (2002). Due Professional Care in the Performance of Work. Statement Auditing Standard No. 99. AICPA New York, NY.
Akbar, D. A., Africano, F., Parlindungan, R., & Khairani, S. (2017). Relevansi Fraud Triangle pada Bank Syariah. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XX, Jember, 2017.
Aprilia, A. (2017). Analisis pengaruh fraud pentagon terhadap kecurangan laporan keuangan menggunakan beneish model pada perusahaan yang menerapkan asean corporate governance scorecard. Jurnal ASET (Akuntansi Riset), 9(1), 101–132. https://doi.org/10.17509/jaset.v9i1.5259
Arisandi, D., & Verawaty, V. (2017). Fraud pentagon dalam mendeteksi kecurangan laporan keuangan pada perusahaan keuangan dan perbankan di Indonesia. Seminar Nasional Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Global Competitive Advantage.
Cressey, D. R. (1953). Other people’s money; a study of the social psychology of embezzlement. Free Press.
Dechow, P. M., Ge, W., Larson, C. R., & Sloan, R. G. (2011). Predicting material accounting misstatements. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(1), 17–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2010.01041.x
Diany, Y. A., & Ratmono, D. (2014). Determinan kecurangan laporan keuangan: Pengujian teori fraud triangle. In Doctoral Dissertation. Fakultas Ekonomika dan Bisnis.
Fimanaya, F., & Syafruddin, M. (2014). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan Non Keuangan Yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2008-2011). Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 3(3), 1–11.
Hanifa, S. I., & Laksito, H. (2015). Pengaruh Fraud Indicators Terhadap Fraudulent Financial Statement: Studi Empiris Pada Perusahaan Yang Listed di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) Tahun 2008-2013. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 4(4), 411–425.
Hery. (2016). Analisis Laporan Keuangan. Jakarta: Grasindo.
Horwarth, C. (2012). The Mind Behind The Fraudsters Crime: Key Behavioral and Environmental Element. Crowe Horwath LLP, 1–62.
Ijudien, D. (2018). Pengaruh Stabilitas Keuangan, Kondisi Industri dan Tekanan Eksternal Terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan. Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi, 2(1), 82–97.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm : Managerial behavior , agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
Kamarudin, K. A., Ismail, W. A. W., & Alwi, M. (2014). The effects of audit committee attributes on fraudulent financial reporting. Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing, 10(5).
Karyono. (2013). Forensic Fraud. Surabaya: Andi Publiser.
Kontan.co.id. (2019). OJK temukan pelanggaran dalam laporan keuangan Garuda Indonesia. https://keuangan.kontan.co.id/news/ojk-temukan-pelanggaran-dalam-laporan-keuangan-garuda-indonesia
Kurnia, A. A., & Anis, I. (2017). Analisis Fraud Pentagon dalam mendeteksi kecurangan laporan keuangan dengan menggunakan Fraud Score Model. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XX. Jember.
Kusuma, I., Perdana, H. D., & Suranta, S. (2017). Fraudulent financial reporting by district/municipal government in indonesia1. Asia Pacific Fraud Journal, 2(1), 27–48. https://doi.org/10.21532/apfj.001.17.02.01.03
Nasution, M. S., Suryani, E., & Lestari, T. U. (2019). Pengaruh Fraud Pentagon Terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan (Studi Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Sub Sektor Makanan Dan Minuman Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2013-2017). Aksara Public, 3(3), 153–165.
Norbarani, L., & Rahardjo, S. N. (2012). Pendeteksian kecurangan laporan Keuangan dengan analisis fraud Triangle yang diadopsi dalam sas no. 99. In Thesis. Fakultas Ekonomika dan Bisnis, Universitas Diponegoro.
Pardosi, R. W., Lindrianasari, & Susilowati, R. Y. N. (2015). Analisis fraud diamond dalam mendeteksi kecurangan laporan keuangan pada perusahaan manufaktur di Indonesia dengan menggunakan fraud score model (tahun 2010-2013). Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 20(1), 67–94.
PCAOB. (2017). Auditing Standards. Washington: PCAOB.
Prasetyo, A. B. (2014). Pengaruh karakteristik komite audit dan perusahaan terhadap kecurangan pelaporan keuangan. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Auditing, 11(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.14710/jaa.11.1.1-24
Priantara, D. (2013). Fraud Auditing & Investigation. Mitra Wacana Media.
Rachmania, A., Slamet, B., & Iryani, L. D. (2017). Analisis pengaruh fraud triangle terhadap kecurangan laporan keuangan pada perusahaan makanan dan minuman yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia periode 2013-2015. Jurnal Online Mahasiswa (JOM) Bidang Akuntansi, 2(2).
Rahmanti, M. M. (2013). Pendeteksian Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Melalui Faktor Risiko Tekanan dan Peluang (Studi Kasus pada Perusahaan yang Mendapat Sanksi dari Bapepam Periode 2002-2006). Diponegoro Journal Of Accounting, 2(2), 1–12.
Rini, V. Y., & Achmad, T. (2012). Analisis prediksi potensi risiko fraudulent financial statement melalui fraud score model (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2008-2010). In Thesis. Fakultas Ekonomika dan Bisnis, Universitas Diponegoro.
Saputra, S. E. (2016). Pengaruh leverage, profitabilitas dan size terhadap pengungkapan Corporate social responsibility pada perusahaan di bursa efek Indonesia. Journal of Economic and Economic Education, 5(1), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.22202/economica.2016.v5.i1.817
Sariutami, A., & Nurbaiti, A. (2018). Analysis of Fraudulent Financial Statement in Fraud Triangle Perspective (Study at Listed Companies in Indonesia Stock Exchange (BEI) in Period 2010-2014). Sustainable Collaboration in Business, Technology, Information and Innovation (SCBTII).
Septriani, Y., & Handayani, D. (2018). Mendeteksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan dengan Analisis Fraud Pentagon. Jurnal Akuntansi Keuangan Dan Bisnis, 11(1), 11–23.
Siddiq, F. R., Achyani, F., & Zulfikar, Z. (2017). Fraud Pentagon dalam Mendeteksi Financial Statement Fraud. Seminar Nasional Dan The 4th Call for Syariah Paper.
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Tessa, G. C., & Harto, P. (2016). Fraudulent financial reporting: Pengujian teori Fraud Pentagon pada sektor keuangan dan perbankan di Indonesia. In Thesis. Fakultas Ekonomika dan Bisnis, Universitas Diponegoro.
Ulfah, M., Nuraina, E., & Wijaya, A. L. (2017). Pengaruh Fraud Pentagon dalam Mendeteksi Fraudulent Financial Reporting (Studi Empiris pada Perbankan di Indonesia Yang Terdaftar di Bei. FIPA: Forum Ilmiah Pendidikan Akuntansi, 5(1).
Wolfe, D. T., & Hermanson, D. R. (2004). The fraud diamond: Considering the four elements of fraud. The CPA Journal, 74(12), 38–42.
Zaki, N. M. (2017). The appropriateness of fraud triangle and diamond models in assesing the likelihood of fraudulent financial statements-An empirical study on firms listed in the Egyptian Stock Exchange. International Journal of Social Science and Economic Research, 2(2), 2403–2433.