Self Efficacy Scale For People With Drug Abuse Disorders

Article Sidebar

jurnal konseling indonesia
PDF
Published: Apr 1, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21067/jki.v3i2.2318
Keywords:
Self Efficacy, Addiction, Drugs Rehabilitation

Main Article Content

Agus Supriyanto
Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
Nurlita Hendiani
Balai Besar Rehabilitasi Narkoba Lido Bogor

Abstract

Intent to influence the process of recovery and relapse prevention for people with Substance Abuse Disorders (GPZ), which is being rehabilitated. The purpose of the study was to find the dimension of self-efficacy people with GPZ to recover from drug addiction, as well as valid and reliable statement items on self-efficacy scale instruments. This study used a mixed methods approach with the transformative sequential design. Instrument research through documentation studies, interviews, and surveys with N = 217. Qualitative descriptive analysis through the study of journal and book, focus group discussion for the determination of the statement items. Quantitative descriptive analysis to know the validity and reliability of the instrument. The findings reveal indicators of self-efficacy scales to recover from addiction through three dimensions, ie (1) level dimension, (2) general dimension, and (3) strength dimension. The self-efficacy scale has 32 valid statements with a coefficient of Corrected Item-Total Correlation ≥ 0148 and has a reliability coefficient of 0.862 with a high category. Self-efficacy scales are useful identifying confidence levels for people's with GPZ during rehabilitation programs and counseling development.

Article Details

How to Cite
Supriyanto, A., & Hendiani, N. (2018). Self Efficacy Scale For People With Drug Abuse Disorders. JKI (Jurnal Konseling Indonesia), 3(2), 57–63. https://doi.org/10.21067/jki.v3i2.2318
Issue
Vol. 3 No. 2 (2018): Jurnal Konseling Indonesia
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Author Biographies

Agus Supriyanto, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

Guidance and Counseling Departement

Nurlita Hendiani, Balai Besar Rehabilitasi Narkoba Lido Bogor

Badan Narkotika Nasional

References

Anggraini, O. D., Wahyuni, E. N., & Soejanto, L. T. (2017). Hubungan antara Efikasi Diri dengan Resiliensi Menghadapi Ujian pada Siswa Kelas XII SMAN 1 Trawas. JKI (Jurnal Konseling Indonesia), 2(2), 50–56.

Arcidiacono, C., Velleman, R., Procentese, F., Berti, P., Albanesi, C., Sommantico, M., & Copello, A. (2010). Italian families living with relatives with alcohol or drugs problems. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 17(6), 659–680.

Arria, A. M., Wilcox, H. C., Caldeira, K. M., Vincent, K. B., Garnier-Dykstra, L. M., & O’Grady, K. E. (2013). Dispelling the myth of “smart drugsâ€Â: Cannabis and alcohol use problems predict nonmedical use of prescription stimulants for studying. Addictive Behaviors, 38(3), 1643–1650.

Bandura, A. (1995). Self-efficacy in changing societies. Cambridge university press.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Macmillan.

Buckingham, S. A., Frings, D., & Albery, I. P. (2013). Group membership and social identity in addiction recovery. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 27(4), 1132.

Chen, C.-Y., Storr, C. L., & Anthony, J. C. (2009). Early-onset drug use and risk for drug dependence problems. Addictive Behaviors, 34(3), 319–322.

Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Larson, R. (2014). Validity and reliability of the experience-sampling method. In Flow and the foundations of positive psychology (pp. 35–54). Springer.

Eickhoff, C., Hämmerlein, A., Griese, N., & Schulz, M. (2012). Nature and frequency of drugâ€Ârelated problems in selfâ€Âmedication (overâ€Âtheâ€Âcounter drugs) in daily community pharmacy practice in Germany. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 21(3), 254–260.

Feist, J., & Feist, G. J. (2008). Theory of personality. Alih Bahasa [2006]. Santoso. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Fu, J. J., Bazazi, A. R., Altice, F. L., Mohamed, M. N., & Kamarulzaman, A. (2012). Absence of antiretroviral therapy and other risk factors for morbidity and mortality in Malaysian compulsory drug detention and rehabilitation centers. PloS One, 7(9), e44249.

Geller, S. M., Greenberg, L. S., & Watson, J. C. (2010). Therapist and client perceptions of therapeutic presence: The development of a measure. Psychotherapy Research, 20(5), 599–610.

Gill, P., Stewart, K., Treasure, E., & Chadwick, B. (2008). Methods of data collection in qualitative research: interviews and focus groups. British Dental Journal, 204(6), 291.

Grinman, M. N., Chiu, S., Redelmeier, D. A., Levinson, W., Kiss, A., Tolomiczenko, G., … Hwang, S. W. (2010). Drug problems among homeless individuals in Toronto, Canada: prevalence, drugs of choice, and relation to health status. BMC Public Health, 10(1), 94.

Lancaster, K., Hughes, C. E., Spicer, B., MATTHEWâ€ÂSIMMONS, F., & Dillon, P. (2011). Illicit drugs and the media: Models of media effects for use in drug policy research. Drug and Alcohol Review, 30(4), 397–402.

Lian, T. C., & Chu, F. Y. (2013). A qualitative study on drug abuse relapse in Malaysia: contributory factors and treatment effectiveness. International Journal of Collaborative Research on Internal Medicine & Public Health, 5(4), 217–232.

Lord, C., Corsello, C., & Grzadzinski, R. (2014). Diagnostic instruments in autistic spectrum disorders. Handbook of Autism and Pervasive Developmental Disorders, Fourth Edition.

Myrick, R. D. (1987). Developmental guidance and counseling: A practical approach. ERIC.

Negus, S. S., & Miller, L. L. (2014). Intracranial self-stimulation to evaluate abuse potential of drugs. Pharmacological Reviews, 66(3), 869–917.

Nsimba, S. E. D. (2009). Problems associated with substandard and counterfeit drugs in developing countries: A review article on global implications of counterfeit drugs in the era of anti-retroviral (ARVS) drugs in a free market economy.

Nurlita, H., & Agus, S. (n.d.). POSTTRAUMATIC GROWTH PADA PECANDU NARKOBA (Landasan Pengembangan Program Konseling Pecandu Narkoba pada Proses Rehabilitasi). In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Konseling Krisis.

Orford, J., Velleman, R., Natera, G., Templeton, L., & Copello, A. (2013). Addiction in the family is a major but neglected contributor to the global burden of adult ill-health. Social Science & Medicine, 78, 70–77.

Perry, J. L., & Carroll, M. E. (2008). The role of impulsive behavior in drug abuse. Psychopharmacology, 200(1), 1–26.

Plummer, P. (2017). Focus group methodology. Part 2: Considerations for analysis. International Journal of Therapy And Rehabilitation, 24(8), 345–351.

Reber, A. S., & Reber, E. S. (2010). Kamus Psikologi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Rezapour, T., DeVito, E. E., Sofuoglu, M., & Ekhtiari, H. (2016). Perspectives on neurocognitive rehabilitation as an adjunct treatment for addictive disorders: from cognitive improvement to relapse prevention. In Progress in brain research (Vol. 224, pp. 345–369). Elsevier.

Romão, V. C., Canhão, H., & Fonseca, J. E. (2013). Old drugs, old problems: where do we stand in prediction of rheumatoid arthritis responsiveness to methotrexate and other synthetic DMARDs? BMC Medicine, 11(1), 17.

Shapiro, B., Coffa, D., & McCance-Katz, E. F. (2013). A primary care approach to substance misuse. Am Fam Physician, 88(2), 113–121.

Supriyanto, A. (2017). Rehabilitation Counseling: Concept Assessment Guidance and Counseling For Drugs Abuse. In Prosiding Seminar Bimbingan dan Konseling (Vol. 1, pp. 19–30).

Vidar Hanstad, D., & Waddington, I. (2009). Sport, health and drugs: a critical re-examination of some key issues and problems. Perspectives in Public Health, 129(4), 174–182.

Wu, A. M. S., Cheung, V. I., Ku, L., & Hung, E. P. W. (2013). Psychological risk factors of addiction to social networking sites among Chinese smartphone users. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 2(3), 160–166.