Efektivitas Konseling Behavioral Model Krumboltz untuk Mengembangkan Keputusan Karir Siswa

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Apr 10, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21067/jki.v4i2.3351

Main Article Content

Wayan Udayani Sastrawati
SMK Negeri 1 Denpasar
Ni Kadek Chandra Purwanti
SMK Negeri 1 Denpasar
Kadek Suhardita
IKIP PGRI Bali
I Ketut Sapta
IKIP PGRI Bali
Ni Komang Sri Yuliastini
IKIP PGRI Bali

Abstract

This research is an experimental study to cultivate student learning outcomes of grade XI Language of SMA N 1 Tabanan. Conditioning and user behavior are limited to those that can be used purely, can not be handled strictly. In this study, the control variables are Krumbotz counseling behavior, while the control class in this study is not given with the same as the experimental class. The sample of research, determined by random sampling technique is random sampling technique through drawing. Based on the First Hypothesis Testing the thitung value of -10.632 with df = (N-1) = (35-1) = 34 and 5% significance level then obtained the value of ttable of 2.032. Since it is larger than ttable, this proves that the first hypothesis in this study can be used and the behavior behavior of the Krumboltz counselor is effective for making decisions for grade XI Language of SMA N 1 Tabanan. Based on Second Hypothesis Testing The average tcount of 8,739 with df = (N1-1) + (N2-1) = (35-1) + (35-1) = 68 and 5% significance level hence the obtained ttable value of 2.011. Since it is larger than ttable, it proves that there are two factors in this study that can be used to determine the behavior of the Krumbolt behavior model (experimental group) with groups of students who are not. Based on these results it will be done counseling behavior Krumboltz behavioral model to develop decisions that can be categorized well and can provide a very effective contribution.

Article Details

How to Cite
Sastrawati, W. U., Purwanti, N. K. C., Suhardita, K., Sapta, I. K., & Yuliastini, N. K. S. (2019). Efektivitas Konseling Behavioral Model Krumboltz untuk Mengembangkan Keputusan Karir Siswa. JKI (Jurnal Konseling Indonesia), 4(2), 63–67. https://doi.org/10.21067/jki.v4i2.3351
Issue
Vol. 4 No. 2 (2019): Jurnal Konseling Indonesia
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

Adiputra, S. (2015). Penggunaan Teknik Modeling Terhadap Perencanaan Karir Siswa. Jurnal Fokus Konseling, 1(1), 45–56.

Islamadina, E. F., & Yulianti, A. (2017). Persepsi terhadap dukungan orangtua dan kesulitan pengambilan keputusan karir pada remaja. Jurnal Psikologi, 12(1), 33–38.

Korohama, K. E. P., Wibowo, M. E., & Tadjri, I. (2017). Model Bimbingan Kelompok dengan Teknik Modeling untuk Meningkatkan Kematangan Karir Siswa. Jurnal Bimbingan Konseling, 6(1), 68–76.

Krumboltz, J. D. (1979). A social learning theory of career decision making. Social Learning and Career Decision Making, 19–49.

Mardiyati, B. D., & Yuniawati, R. (2015). Perbedaan adaptabilitas karir ditinjau dari jenis sekolah (SMA dan SMK). Empathy, 3(1), 31–41.

Marti’ah, S., Theodora, B. D., & Haryanto, H. (2018). Pengaruh Lingkungan Keluarga terhadap Pilihan Karir Siswa. SAP (Susunan Artikel Pendidikan), 2(3).

Nurrega, R. G., Wahyuningsih, H., & Gusniarti, U. (2018). Konseling Karir Kelompok Cognitive Information Processing untuk Meningkatkan Pengambilan Keputusan Karir Siswa. Journal of Psychological Science and Profession, 2(1), 127–134.

Saputra, W. N. E., & Widiasari, S. (2017). Konseling Karir Ringkas Berfokus Solusi: Konseling Karir Untuk Membantu Menetapkan Pilihan Karir Siswa Smk Menghadapi Mea. Jurnal Fokus Konseling, 3(1), 24–31.

Setiobudi, J. (2017). Pengaruh efikasi diri terhadap pengambilan keputusan karir pada siswa kelas xii sma negeri 1 kalasan. Jurnal Riset Mahasiswa Bimbingan Dan Konseling, 3(1), 98–111.

Warsita, B. (2018). Teori Belajar Robert M. Gagne dan Implikasinya pada Pentingnya Pusat Sumber Belajar. Jurnal Teknodik, 12(1), 64–78.