Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Law Panorama Journal is published twice a year (June and December) by Faculty of Law, Kanjuruhan University of Malang. Journal of Law Panorama As a Forum for Information and Development of Law Science which contains Research Result, Study and Application of Theory and Conceptual Ideas from Law Observers.

Jurnal Panorama Hukum: diterbitkan oleh Fakultas Hukum Universitas Kanjuruhan Malang yang terbit dua kali dalam satu tahun (Juni dan Desember). Jurnal Panorama Hukum Sebagai Wahana Informasi dan pengembangan Ilmu Hukum yang berisi Hasil Penelitian, Kajian dan Aplikasi Teori serta gagasan Konseptual dari para pemerhati Hukum


Section Policies


Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process

Each article will be reviewed by two partner partners and the editor is entitled to select and edit incoming scripts. Certainty of loading or rejection of the script will be notified to the author. The priority of loading the manuscript is based on the assessment of the substance and the order of the incoming manuscripts. The substance of writing or articles is entirely the responsibility of the author. Scripts that are not loaded will not be returned

Setiap jurnal akan ditelaah oleh dua orang mitra bebestari dan penyunting berhak menyeleksi dan mengedit naskah yang masuk. Kepastian pemuatan atau penolakan naskah akan diberitahukan kepada penulis. Prioritas pemuatan naskah didasarkan pada penilaian substansi dan urutan naskah yang masuk. Substansi tulisan atau artikel sepenuhnya menjadi tanggung jawab penulis. Naskah yang tidak dimuat tidak akan dikembalikan.


Publication Frequency

Law Panorama Journal is published twice a year (June and December)


Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.



This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...


Publication Ethics

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement
Jurnal Panorama Hukum is published twice a year (June and December) by Faculty of Law, Kanjuruhan University of Malang, with registered number ISSN P: 2527-6654 ISSN e: 2528-1997. is a peer-reviewed journal, available in print and online and published two times a year. This statement clarifies ethical behaviour of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, the chief editor, the Editorial Board, the peer-reviewer¬¬¬¬¬ and the publisher (Fakultas Hukum Universitas Kanjuruhan Malang). This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.
Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication
The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed Jurnal Panorama Hukum, with registered number ISSN p: 2527-6654 ISSN e: 2528-1997. is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher and the society.
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Kanjuruhan Malang as publisher of Jurnal Panorama Hukum, with registered number ISSN p: 2527-6654 ISSN e: 2528-1997. takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions.
Publication decisions
The editor of the Jurnal Panorama Hukum, with registered number ISSN p: 2527-6654 ISSN e: 2528-1997. is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
Fair play
An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.
The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.
Duties of Reviewers
Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.
Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.
Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.
Standards of Objectivity
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.
Acknowledgement of Sources
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
Duties of Authors
Reporting standards
Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.
Originality and Plagiarism
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.
Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication
An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.
Acknowledgment of Sources
Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.
Authorship of the Paper
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.
Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.
Fundamental errors in published works
When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

Hasil gambar untuk google scholar