PROBLEMATIKA PELAKSANAAN PUTUSAN ARBITRASE INTERNASIONAL DI INDONESIA (Kajian Terhadap Konsep Keadilan Dalam Perspektif Filsafat Hukum Dan Filsafat Hukum Islam)
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The international arbitration awards are basically final and binding. By its nature international arbitration award should has the power of self execution. However, the nature is not absolute because it is still open certain legal efforts. The existence of such legal effort causes the arbitral award not necessarily to be directly executed.
This study aims to find out how the problematic of the implementation of international arbitration decision when viewed from the concept of justice in the perspective of legal philosophy and philosophy of Islamic law. The research is analytical descriptive with normative juridical approach and data obtained through library research.
This research concluded that the implementation of international arbitration award faced with many obstacles causing delay of execution of the decision. As is known the purpose of the parties to choose arbitration institution as a dispute settlement forum is to get justice. However, if viewed from the perspective of legal philosophy, the enforcement of international arbitration rulings is not in line with the expected goal is to achieve justice. In line with that, the purpose of law in Islamic law perspective to realize kemashlahatan also can not be obtained by the parties. Due to the failure of the execution process, the search for justice or kemashlahatan also failed to execute.
Keywords: international arbitration award, justice.
This study aims to find out how the problematic of the implementation of international arbitration decision when viewed from the concept of justice in the perspective of legal philosophy and philosophy of Islamic law. The research is analytical descriptive with normative juridical approach and data obtained through library research.
This research concluded that the implementation of international arbitration award faced with many obstacles causing delay of execution of the decision. As is known the purpose of the parties to choose arbitration institution as a dispute settlement forum is to get justice. However, if viewed from the perspective of legal philosophy, the enforcement of international arbitration rulings is not in line with the expected goal is to achieve justice. In line with that, the purpose of law in Islamic law perspective to realize kemashlahatan also can not be obtained by the parties. Due to the failure of the execution process, the search for justice or kemashlahatan also failed to execute.
Keywords: international arbitration award, justice.
Article Details
How to Cite
dewi, ayu atika. (2017). PROBLEMATIKA PELAKSANAAN PUTUSAN ARBITRASE INTERNASIONAL DI INDONESIA (Kajian Terhadap Konsep Keadilan Dalam Perspektif Filsafat Hukum Dan Filsafat Hukum Islam). Jurnal Panorama Hukum, 2(2), 185–202. https://doi.org/10.21067/jph.v2i2.2036
Section
Articles
References
Aburaera, Sukarno, dkk., (2013), Filsafat Hukum: Teori dan Praktik, Edisi Pertama, Jakarta: Kencana.
Angkasa, (2010), Filsafat Hukum, Purwokerto: Universitas Jenderal Soedirman.
Azhari, H.M. Tahir, (2001) Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Forum Arbitrase Prospek Pelaksanaan Putusan Arbitrase di Indonesia, Cet. 1, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Batubara, Suleman dan Orinton Purba, (2013), Arbitrase Internasional Penyelesaian Sengketa Investasi Asing Melalui ICSID, UNCITRAL dan SIAC, Jakarta: Raih Asa Sukses.
Cakra, Andi Julia, (2015), Penerapan Konsep Hukum Arbitrase Online di Indonesia, Yogyakarta: Rangkang Education.
Gautama, Sudargo, (1999), Undang-Undang Arbitrase Baru 1999, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Muhammad Syukri Albani Nasution, dkk., (2016), Hukum Dalam Pendekatan Filsafat, Jakarta: Kencana.
Halim, A. Ridwan, (2005), Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Dalam Tanya Jawab, Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
Harahap, M. Yahya, (1991), Arbitrase. Jakarta: Pustaka Kartini.
Marzuki, Laica, (1995), Bagian Kesadaran Hukum Rakyat Bugis, Makassar: Hasanuddin University Press.
Suherman, Ade Maman, (2004), Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa, Aspek Hukum Dalam Ekonomi Global, Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
Soehino, (2004), Ilmu Negara, Yogyakarta: Liberty.
Tafsir, Ahmad, (2006), Filsafat Ilmu: Mengurai Ontologi, Epistemologi dan Aksiologi Pengetahuan, Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Toar, Agnes M., (2004), Arbitrase di Indonesia, Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
Qardawi, Yusuf, (2007), Fiqh Maqashid Syari’ah, Pustaka Al Kautsar.
Jurnal
Erman Rajagukguk, Hukum Ekonomi Indonesia: Menjaga Persatuan Bangsa, Memulihkan Ekonomi, dan Memperluas Kesejahteraan Sosial, Jurnal Hukum Bisnis, Vol.5, 2003, Hlm. 22.
Mahir Amin, Konsep Keadilan Dalam Perspektif Filsafat Hukum Islam, Al Daulah: Jurnal Hukum dan Perundangan Islam, Vol. 4, No.2, Oktober 2014, ISSN 2089-0109, hlm. 340.
Website
M. Husseyn Umar, Pokok-Pokok Masalah Pelaksanaan Putusan Arbitrase Internasional, www.hukumonline.com., diakses tanggal 11 Desember 2016.
Todung Mulya Lubis, Pendidikan HAM Ada Pada Karya Sastra, www.kompas.com., diakses tanggal 12 Maret 2017.
Peraturan Perundang-undangan
UU No. 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa
UU No. 5 Tahun 1968 tentang Pengesahan Convention on the Settlement on Investment Disputes Between States aand National of Other State (Konvesi ICSID)
Keppres No. 34 Tahun 1981 tentang Pengesahan Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award (Konvensi New York 1958)
PERMA No. 1 Tahun 1990 tentang Tata Cara Pelaksanaan Putusan Arbitrase Asing di Indonesia
Angkasa, (2010), Filsafat Hukum, Purwokerto: Universitas Jenderal Soedirman.
Azhari, H.M. Tahir, (2001) Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Forum Arbitrase Prospek Pelaksanaan Putusan Arbitrase di Indonesia, Cet. 1, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Batubara, Suleman dan Orinton Purba, (2013), Arbitrase Internasional Penyelesaian Sengketa Investasi Asing Melalui ICSID, UNCITRAL dan SIAC, Jakarta: Raih Asa Sukses.
Cakra, Andi Julia, (2015), Penerapan Konsep Hukum Arbitrase Online di Indonesia, Yogyakarta: Rangkang Education.
Gautama, Sudargo, (1999), Undang-Undang Arbitrase Baru 1999, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Muhammad Syukri Albani Nasution, dkk., (2016), Hukum Dalam Pendekatan Filsafat, Jakarta: Kencana.
Halim, A. Ridwan, (2005), Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Dalam Tanya Jawab, Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
Harahap, M. Yahya, (1991), Arbitrase. Jakarta: Pustaka Kartini.
Marzuki, Laica, (1995), Bagian Kesadaran Hukum Rakyat Bugis, Makassar: Hasanuddin University Press.
Suherman, Ade Maman, (2004), Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa, Aspek Hukum Dalam Ekonomi Global, Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
Soehino, (2004), Ilmu Negara, Yogyakarta: Liberty.
Tafsir, Ahmad, (2006), Filsafat Ilmu: Mengurai Ontologi, Epistemologi dan Aksiologi Pengetahuan, Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Toar, Agnes M., (2004), Arbitrase di Indonesia, Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
Qardawi, Yusuf, (2007), Fiqh Maqashid Syari’ah, Pustaka Al Kautsar.
Jurnal
Erman Rajagukguk, Hukum Ekonomi Indonesia: Menjaga Persatuan Bangsa, Memulihkan Ekonomi, dan Memperluas Kesejahteraan Sosial, Jurnal Hukum Bisnis, Vol.5, 2003, Hlm. 22.
Mahir Amin, Konsep Keadilan Dalam Perspektif Filsafat Hukum Islam, Al Daulah: Jurnal Hukum dan Perundangan Islam, Vol. 4, No.2, Oktober 2014, ISSN 2089-0109, hlm. 340.
Website
M. Husseyn Umar, Pokok-Pokok Masalah Pelaksanaan Putusan Arbitrase Internasional, www.hukumonline.com., diakses tanggal 11 Desember 2016.
Todung Mulya Lubis, Pendidikan HAM Ada Pada Karya Sastra, www.kompas.com., diakses tanggal 12 Maret 2017.
Peraturan Perundang-undangan
UU No. 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa
UU No. 5 Tahun 1968 tentang Pengesahan Convention on the Settlement on Investment Disputes Between States aand National of Other State (Konvesi ICSID)
Keppres No. 34 Tahun 1981 tentang Pengesahan Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award (Konvensi New York 1958)
PERMA No. 1 Tahun 1990 tentang Tata Cara Pelaksanaan Putusan Arbitrase Asing di Indonesia