Computer-assisted recitation program: A focused study on students’ conceptual understanding on force and motion
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21067/mpej.v7i1.6844Keywords:
recitation program, conceptual understanding, force and motionAbstract
Recitation programs have been developed and tested on the topic of force and motion. The program consists of 63 multiple choice questions with feedback made in 3 packages (one package each week). This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of the program. This research is a quantitative research with a quasi-experimental design. The applied experimental design is a one group pretest-posttest design. The program was given for 3 weeks by giving 1 recitation package at each meeting (there are 21 questions for every package). The study was conducted on 38 Physics Education students’ who enrolled the Material and Learning Physics I course. The pretest-posttest questions consisted of 15 reasoned multiple-choice questions. Data analysis was performed by determining descriptive statistics, paired sample t-test, N-gain, and d-effect size. The research found that the program significantly improved students’ conceptual understanding with N-gain of 0.498 and d-effect size of 1.559. These results indicate that the provision of recitation programs can improve students' conceptual understanding on force and motion, especially in determining the F(t) graph from the v(t) graph, where initially the ability to solve problems in the form of graphical representations is one of the difficult matters for students.
Downloads
References
Ambrosis, A. De, Malgieri, M., Mascheretti, P., & Onorato, P. (2015). Investigating the role of sliding friction in rolling motion: A teaching sequence based on experiments and simulations. European Journal of Physics, 36(3), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/36/3/035020
Brahmia, S. W., Olsho, A., Smith, T. I., & Boudreaux, A. (2020). Framework for the natures of negativity in introductory physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 16(1), 10120. https://doi.org/10.1103/PHYSREVPHYSEDUCRES.16.010120
De Cock, M. (2012). Representation use and strategy choice in physics problem solving. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 8(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.020117
Diyana, T. N., Sutopo, & Sunaryono. (2020). The effectiveness of web-based recitation program on improving students’ conceptual understanding in fluid mechanics. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(2), 219–230. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i2.24043
Diyana, Tsania Nur, Sutopo, & Sunaryono. (2020). Concept enhancement of undergraduate students in static fluid by using assisted web-based recitation program. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2296, 1–7.
Docktor, J. L., & Mestre, J. P. (2014a). Synthesis of discipline-based education research in physics. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 10(2), 020119. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.020119
Docktor, J. L., & Mestre, J. P. (2014b). Synthesis of discipline-based education research in physics. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 10(2), 1–148. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.020119
Fadlilah, N., Sulisworo, D., & Maruto, G. (2020). The Effectiveness of a Video-based Laboratory on Discovery Learning to Enhance Learning Outcomes. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(8), 3648–3654. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080843
Hakim, L., Lubis, P. H. M., Lefudin, L., & Sulistyowati, R. (2022). The Relationship between Learning Style toward Mastery of Concepts and Problem Solving Skill Introduction to Nuclear Physics for Pre-Service Teacher. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(2), 666–673. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i2.1176
Hassouny, E. H. El, Kaddari, F., Elachqar, A., & Alami, A. (2014). Teaching/Learning Mechanics in High School with the Help of Dynamic Software. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 4617–4621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.995
Hegde, B., & Meera, B. N. (2012). How do they solve it? An insight into the learner’s approach to the mechanism of physics problem solving. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 8(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010109
Hermansyah, H., Nurhairunnisah, N., Sentaya, I. M., Sulindra, I. G. M., Andriani, N., & Gunawan, G. (2021). The Effect of Physics Virtual Experiments on Mastery Concept Based on Students Learning Style. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1933(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1933/1/012079
Heron, P. R. L. (2015). Effect of lecture instruction on student performance on qualitative questions. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 11(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.11.010102
Keeley, P. (2011). Uncovering Student Ideas in Life Science. National Science Teachers Association Press.
Klein, P., Müller, A., & Kuhn, J. (2017). Assessment of representational competence in kinematics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.010132
Maison, Astalini, Darmaji, Kurniawan, D. A., Perdana, R., & Anggraini, L. (2019). The phenomenon of physicology senior high school education: Relationship of students’ attitudes toward physic, learning style, motivation. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(10), 2199–2207. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.071018
Mashood, K. K., & Singh, V. A. (2012). An inventory on rotational kinematics of a particle: Unravelling misconceptions and pitfalls in reasoning. European Journal of Physics, 33(5), 1301–1312. https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/33/5/1301
Motlhabane, A. (2016). Learner’s alternative and misconceptions in physics: A phenomenographic study. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 15(4), 424–440.
Pebriana, I. N., Sutopo, & Diantoro, M. (2018). Dampak Program Resitasi terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Mahasiswa pada Topik Fluida Dinamis. Jurnal Pendidikan : Teori Penelitian Dan Pengembangan, 3(8), 1110–1114.
Phage, I. B., Lemmer, M., & Hitge, M. (2017). Probing factors influencing students’ graph comprehension regarding four operations in kinematics graphs. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(2), 200–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2017.1333751
Rahmawati, I., & Sutopo. (2019). Computer-assisted recitation program to improve students’ conceptual understanding. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2194, 6–11. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5139829
Rosdiana, L., & Ulya, R. M. (2021). The Effectiveness of the Animation Video Learning Earth’s Layer Media to Improve Students’ Concept Understanding. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1899(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1899/1/012172
Ryan, Q. X., Frodermann, E., Heller, K., Hsu, L., & Mason, A. (2016). Computer problem-solving coaches for introductory physics: Design and usability studies. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(1), 1–17.
Serway, R. A., Vuille, C., & Hughes, J. (2013). College Physics (10th). Gengage Learning.
Serway, R., & Jewett, J. (2015). Physics for Scientists and Engineers with Modern Physics (eight edit).
Sornkhatha, P., & Srisawasdi, N. (2013). Supporting Conceptual Development in Newton’s Laws of Motion Using an Interactive Computer-simulated Laboratory Environment. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 2010–2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.157
Suma, K., Sadia, W., & Pujani, N. M. (2018). Investigating 12th-Grade Students’ Prior Knowledge of Static Electricity Concepts. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 13(2), 163–172. http://www.ijese.com
Suruchi, & Rana, S. S. (2014). Test item analysis and relationship between difficulty level and discrimination index of test items in an achievement test in biology. Paripex - Indian Journal of Research, 3(6), 56–58.
Sutopo, Jayanti, I. B., & Wartono. (2016). Efektivitas program resitasi berbasis komputer untuk meningkatkan penguasaan konsep mahasiswa tentang gaya dan gerak. Jurnal Inovasi Dan Pembelajaran Fisika, 3(1), 111–119.
Sutopo, Lilliasari, Waldrip, B., & Rusdiana, D. (2012). Impact of Representational Apprach on the Improvement of Student Understanding of Acceleration. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 8(22), 161–173.
Sutopo, & Waldrip, B. (2014). Impact of a Representational Approach on Students ’. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(November 2012), 741–766. https://link-springer-com.ezproxy.utm.my/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs10763-013-9431-y.pdf
Taqwa, M. R. A., Hidayat, A., & Supoto. (2017). Konsistensi Pemahaman Konsep Kecepatan dalam Berbagai Representasi. Jurnal Riset & Kajian Pendidikan Fisika, 4(1), 31–39. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.12928/jrkpf.v4i1.6469
Waldrip, B., Prain, V., & Carolan, J. (2010). Using multi-modal representations to improve learning in junior secondary science. Research in Science Education, 40(1), 65–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9157-6
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Momentum: Physics Education Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Momentum: Physisc Education Journal allows readers to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of its articles and allow readers to use them for any other lawful purpose. 
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The Authors submitting a manuscript do so with the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to Momentum: Physics Education Journal
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
