Main Article Content
This research aims at identifying conceptual understanding and Physics scientific processing skill of students in IDEAL learning strategy with formative feedback and IDEAL learning only without formative feedback. It employed semi-experimental design using posttest only control group design. The sampling technique used random sampling. This research took two classes of XI graders of Natural Science classes from SMAN 2 Banjarmasin. The control class was taught by using IDEAL strategy only without formative feedback. While the experimental class was taught by using IDEAL strategy with formative feedback. There is a significant difference of conceptual understanding and Physics scientific processing skill of students between IDEAL strategy with formative feedback and IDEAL strategy without formative feedback. It further affirms that students’ conceptual understanding in the class taught by IDEAL strategy with formative feedback is higher than the other. As well, students’ scientific processing skill in the class taught by IDEAL strategy with formative feedback is higher than the other.
Momentum: Physisc Education Journal allows readers to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of its articles and allow readers to use them for any other lawful purpose.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The Authors submitting a manuscript do so with the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to Momentum: Physics Education Journal
Arends, R.I.(2008). Learning to Teach: Belajar untuk Mengajar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belgia.
Asia E-University. (2009). "Metacognition and Constructivism." Chapter 6 in Education Psychology (online course). Pages 142-169.
Bransford, J. D. & Stein B. S. (1984). The IDEAL Workplace: Strategies for Improving Learning, Problem Solving, and creativity. New York.:W. H. Freeman &Company.
Buczynski, S. (2009). 10 Tips for Providing Formative Feedback. The Professional Association in Education. USA: Phi Delta Kappa International.
Cengange Learning. (2010). Teaching Metacognitive Strategies. Australia: Educational Psychology for Learning & Teaching.
Cohen, J, etc. (2010). Written Formative Feedback: Building Problem Solving & mathematical Understanding. Education Northwest. (Online) (http://educationnorthwest.org) diakses 17 Juni 2013.
Creswell, J W. & Vicki L. P C. (2008). Designing and conducting Mixed Methods Research. London : Sage Publications.
Kline, M A. (1995). An Empirical Study Comparing Three Problem-Solving Techniques. Ball State University.
Nuun, G. D & McMahan, K. R. (2001). "IDEAL" Problem Solving Using a Collaborative Effort for Special Needs and At-Risk Students. Journal of Education, Winter. (Online), diakses 2 Juli 2013.
Oxford Brookes University. (2002). Learning and Teaching Briefing Papers Series. (Online) (www.brookes.ac.uk) diakses 19 Juni 2013.
Salkind, N J. (2006). Exploring Research Sixth Edition. New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc.
Shute, V J. (2007). Focus on Formative Feedback. Educational Testing Service, (Online) (http://www.ets.org) diakses 18 Juni 2013.
Wylie, E. C. (2008). Formative Assessment: Examples of Practice. Council of Chief State School Officers. (Online) (www.ccsso.org) diakses 17 Juni 2013.