The learning program validity of using the ExPRession model to stimulate students’ systems thinking and numeracy skills
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21067/mpej.v7i1.8096Keywords:
Learning Programs, Expression Learning Models, System Thinking Skills, Numeracy SkillsAbstract
This study aims to describe a learning program using the ExPRession model which is valid in stimulating students' systems thinking and numeracy skills on the topic of light interference. The design of this research is Design and Development Research (DDR). The data from this study were in the form of validity test results which were analyzed using mixed methods (quantitative and qualitative). The results of the data analysis showed that the learning program developed obtained a score percentage of 91.1% with very valid criteria. Based on the results of data analysis, it can be concluded that the learning program with the Expression model is very valid to stimulate students' systems thinking and numeracy skills. This is because the content validity shows that the learning program using the Expression model can be applied in learning Physics in Senior High School Class XI in the even semester on the topic of Optics (Light Interference) to stimulate students' systems thinking and numeracy skills. Furthermore, in terms of media and design validity, the teaching materials in this learning program are very interactive or multimedia-based. Therefore, they can be innovations to attract interest and motivate students to learn.
Downloads
References
Adel, A., & Dayan, J. (2021). Towards an intelligent blended system of learning activities model for New Zealand institutions: an investigative approach. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8(1), 1–14.
Afandi, A., Sajidan, S., Akhyar, M., & Suryani, N. (2019). Development frameworks of the Indonesian partnership 21st-century skills standards for prospective science teachers: A Delphi Study. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(1), 89–100.
Ambrose, B. S., Shaffer, P. S., Steinberg, R. N., Mcdermott, L. C., Ambrose, B. S., Shaffer, P. S., Steinberg, R. N., & Mcdermott, L. C. (2006). An investigation of student understanding of single-slit diffraction and double-slit interference An investigation of student understanding of single-slit diffraction and double-slit interference. 146(May 2014). https://doi.org/10.1119/1.19210
Aminudin, A. H., Kaniawati, I., Suhendi, E., Samsudin, A., Coştu, B., & Adimayuda, R. (2019). Rasch analysis of Multitier Open-ended Light-Wave Instrument (MOLWI): Developing and assessing second-years sundanese-scholars alternative conceptions. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(3), 557–579.
Ashraf, A. (2020). Challenges and possibilities in teaching and learning of calculus: A case study of India. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(1), 407–433.
Aslan, S. (2015). Is learning by teaching effective in gaining 21st century skills? The views of pre-service science teachers. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 15(6).
Aspridanel, A., Abdurrahman, A., Lengkana, D., & Jalmo, T. (2022). STEM-Integrated Flipped Classroom in the Teacher’s Perspective: Could its Implementation in E-Module Improve System Thinking Ability? Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(1), 43–52.
Asrizal, Amran, A., Ananda, A., Festiyed, F., & Sumarmin, R. (2018). The development of integrated science instructional materials to improve students’ digital literacy in scientific approach. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(4), 442–450. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i4.13613
Aufa, M., Saragih, S., & Minarni, A. (2016). Development of Learning Devices through Problem Based Learning Model Based on the Context of Aceh Cultural to Improve Mathematical Communication Skills and Social Skills of SMPN 1 Muara Batu Students. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(24), 232–248.
Barak, M. (2017). Science teacher education in the twenty-first century: A pedagogical framework for technology-integrated social constructivism. Research in Science Education, 47, 283–303.
Beatty, A., Berkhout, E., Bima, L., Coen, T., Pradhan, M., & Suryadarma, D. (2018). Indonesia Got Schooled: 15 Years of Rising Enrolment and Flat Learning Profiles. Jakarta: RISE Programme in Indonesia.
Bobek, E., & Tversky, B. (2016). Creating visual explanations improves learning. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 1, 1–14.
Bower, M., Howe, C., McCredie, N., Robinson, A., & Grover, D. (2014). Augmented Reality in education–cases, places and potentials. Educational Media International, 51(1), 1–15.
Calmer, J. M. (2019). Teaching Physics within a Next Generation Science Standards Perspective. Pedagogical Research, 4(4), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/5868
Can, H. (2021). Implementation Of Systems Thinking Skills Module For The Context Of Energy.
Cheng, K.-M. (2017). Advancing 21st Century Competencies in East Asian Education Systems.
Collins, J. (2002). Teaching and Learning with Multimedia. In Teaching and Learning with Multimedia. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203441305
Delgado, F. (2021). Teaching physics for computer science students in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: A fully internet-supported course. Future Internet, 13(2), 35.
Docktor, J. L., & Mestre, J. P. (2014). Synthesis of discipline-based education research in physics. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 10(2), 020119.
Doleck, T., Bazelais, P., Lemay, D. J., Saxena, A., & Basnet, R. B. (2017). Algorithmic thinking, cooperativity, creativity, critical thinking, and problem solving: exploring the relationship between computational thinking skills and academic performance. Journal of Computers in Education, 4, 355–369.
Doyan, A., Makhrus, M., & Zamrizal, W. (2021). Development of Modern Physics Learning Devices Using Inquiry Learning Model Assisted with Virtual Media to Improve Student Cognitive Learning Result. 5th Asian Education Symposium 2020 (AES 2020), 213–216.
Fahrurrozi, M. & Mohzana. (2020). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran. NTB: Universitas Hamzanwadi Press.
Febrian, A., & Ma’ruf, Z. (2021). Design and development of e-learning devices based on massive open online course (MOOC) on static fluids material. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2049(1), 012059.
Furtak, E. M., & Penuel, W. R. (2019). Coming to terms: Addressing the persistence of “handsâ€on†and other reform terminology in the era of science as practice. Science Education, 103(1), 167–186.
Geller, B. D., Turpen, C., & Crouch, C. H. (2018). Sources of student engagement in Introductory Physics for Life Sciences. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14(1), 10118.
Gleason, N. W. (2018). Higher Education in the Era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. In Higher Education in the Era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0194-0
Gunawan, G., Harjono, A., Herayanti, L., & Husein, S. (2019). Problem-based learning approach with supported interactive multimedia in physics course: Its effects on critical thinking disposition. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(4), 1075–1089.
Gurr, D., Longmuir, F., & Reed, C. (2020). Creating successful and unique schools: leadership, context and systems thinking perspectives. Journal of Educational Administration.
Häkkinen, P., Järvelä, S., Mäkitalo-Siegl, K., Ahonen, A., Näykki, P., & Valtonen, T. (2017). Preparing teacher-students for twenty-first-century learning practices (PREP 21): a framework for enhancing collaborative problem-solving and strategic learning skills. Teachers and Teaching, 23(1), 25–41.
Herlina, K. (2020). Model Pembelajaran ExPRession untuk Membangun Model Mental dan Kemampuan Problem Solving (Pertama). Graha Ilmu.
Hilpert, J. C., & Marchand, G. C. (2018). Complex systems research in educational psychology: Aligning theory and method. Educational Psychologist, 53(3), 185–202.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2014). Fish swim, rocks sit, and lungs breathe: Expert-novice understanding of complex systems and designs for learning. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/230726725
Hogan, K. (2000). Assessing students’ systems reasoning in ecology. Journal of Biological Education, 35(1), 22–28.
Hudha, M. N., & Batlolona, J. R. (2017). How are the physics critical thinking skills of the students taught by using inquiry-discovery through empirical and theorethical overview? Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(2), 691–697.
Iglesias-Pradas, S., Hernández-GarcÃa, Ã., Chaparro-Peláez, J., & Prieto, J. L. (2021). Emergency remote teaching and students’ academic performance in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: A case study. Computers in Human Behavior, 119, 106713.
Jacobson, M. J. (2001). Problem solving, cognition, and complex systems: Differences between experts and novices. Complexity, 6(3), 41–49.
Jacobson, M. J. (2006). Complex systems in education: Scientific and educational importance and implications for the learning sciences Human-Agent Teamwork in Collaborative Virtual Environments View project. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220040401
Jang, H. (2016). Identifying 21st century STEM competencies using workplace data. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25, 284–301.
Kan’an, A. (2018). The Relationship between Jordanian Students’ 21st Century Skills (Cs21) and Academic Achievement in Science. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 15(2), 82–94.
Ke, L., Sadler, T. D., Zangori, L., & Friedrichsen, P. J. (2021). Developing and using multiple models to promote scientific literacy in the context of socio-scientific issues. Science & Education, 30(3), 589–607.
Keiler, L. S. (2018). Teachers’ roles and identities in student-centered classrooms. International Journal of STEM Education, 5, 1–20.
Krijtenburg-Lewerissa, K., Pol, H. J., Brinkman, A., & van Joolingen, W. R. (2017). Insights into teaching quantum mechanics in secondary and lower undergraduate education. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(1), 010109.
Kubricht, J. R., Holyoak, K. J., & Lu, H. (2017). Intuitive physics: Current research and controversies. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(10), 749–759.
Kusasi, M., Fahmi, F., Sanjaya, R. E., Riduan, M., & Anjani, N. (2021). Feasibility of STEM-based basic chemistry teaching materials to improve students’ science literature in wetland context. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2104(1), 012022.
Lucas, B., & Hanson, J. (2016). Thinking like an engineer: Using engineering habits of mind and signature pedagogies to redesign engineering education.
Maani, K. E., & Maharaj, V. (2004). Links between systems thinking and complex decision making. System Dynamics Review: The Journal of the System Dynamics Society, 20(1), 21–48.
Marshman, E., & Singh, C. (2017). Investigating and improving student understanding of quantum mechanics in the context of single photon interference. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(1), 010117.
Matlin, S. A., Mehta, G., Hopf, H., & Krief, A. (2016). One-world chemistry and systems thinking. Nature Chemistry, 8(5), 393–398.
Mayer, R. (1999). Research-based principles for the design of instructional messages: The case of multimedia explanations. Document Design, 1(1), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1075/dd.1.1.02may
Megawati, L. A., & Sutarto, H. (2021). Analysis numeracy literacy skills in terms of standardized math problem on a minimum competency assessment. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education, 10(2).
Menggo, S., Suastra, I., Budiarsa, M., & Padmadewi, N. N. (2019). Needs Analysis of Academic-English Speaking Material in Promoting 21st Century Skills. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 739–754.
Mešić, V., Hajder, E., Neumann, K., & Erceg, N. (2016). Comparing different approaches to visualizing light waves: An experimental study on teaching wave optics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(1), 010135.
Mutakinati, L., Anwari, I., & Kumano, Y. (2018). Analysis of Studentsâ€TM Critical Thinking Skill of Middle School through STEM Education Project-Based Learning. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(1), 54–65.
Nahdi, D. S., Jatisunda, M. G., Cahyaningsih, U., & Suciawati, V. (2020). Pre-service teacher’s ability in solving mathematics problem viewed from numeracy literacy skills. Ilkogretim Online, 19(4).
Novitra, F., Festiyed, Yohandri, & Asrizal. (2021). Development of Online-based Inquiry Learning Model to Improve 21st-Century Skills of Physics Students in Senior High School. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(9), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11152
Nurdiansah, I., Islami, F. H., & Nana, N. (2020). Penerapan Model Poe2we yang di Integrasikan Dengan Bencana Tsunami Sebagai Upaya Pemahaman Konsep Fisika Pada Materi Gelombang Berjalan Dan Gelombang Stasioner Bagi Siswa Kelas XI SMA. EduFisika, 5(01), 16–22.
Nurse, M. S., & Grant, W. J. (2020). I’ll see it when I believe it: Motivated numeracy in perceptions of climate change risk. Environmental Communication, 14(2), 184–201.
Onyema, E. M., Ogechukwu, U., Anthonia, E. C. D., & Deborah, E. C. (2019). Potentials of mobile technologies in enhancing the effectiveness of inquiry-based learning approach. International Journal of Education (IJE), 2(01), 1–22.
Orgill, M., York, S., & MacKellar, J. (2019). Introduction to systems thinking for the chemistry education community. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(12), 2720–2729.
Pallant, A., & Lee, H.-S. (2015). Constructing scientific arguments using evidence from dynamic computational climate models. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24, 378–395.
Partnership for 21st Century - A Network of Battelle for Kids [P21]. (2019). Framework for 21st Century Learning. Partnership for 21st Century Learning. http://static.battelleforkids.org/documen%0Ats/p21/P21_Framework_Brief.pdf
Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., de Jong, T., van Riesen, S. A. N., Kamp, E. T., Manoli, C. C., Zacharia, Z. C., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61.
Penner, D. E. (2000). Explaining systems: Investigating middle school students’ understanding of emergent phenomena. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 37(8), 784–806.
Plomp, Tj. (Tjeerd), & Nieveen, N. M. (2010). An introduction to educational design research : proceedings of the seminar conducted at the East China Normal University, Shanghai (PR China), November 23-26, 2007. SLO.
Prayogi, S., & Yuanita, L. (2018). Critical Inquiry Based Learning: A Model of Learning to Promote Critical Thinking among Prospective Teachers of Physic. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 15(1), 43–56.
Putranta, H., & Jumadi, J. (2019). Physics teacher efforts of Islamic high school in Yogyakarta to minimize students’ anxiety when facing the assessment of physics learning outcomes. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(2), 119–136.
Putranta, H., & Supahar, S. (2019). Development of physics-tier tests (PysTT) to measure students’ conceptual understanding and creative thinking skills: a qualitative synthesis. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(3), 747–775.
Rahman, K., Qodriyah, K., Bali, M. M. E. I., Baharun, H., & Muali, C. (2020). Effectiveness of android-based mathematics learning media application on student learning achievement. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1594(1), 012047.
Reid, A., Dillon, J., Ardoin, N., & Ferreira, J.-A. (2021). Scientists’ warnings and the need to reimagine, recreate, and restore environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 27(6), 783–795.
Rezeki, S., Andrian, D., Wahyuni, A., & Nurkholisah, H. (2020). The sustainability concept of Riau cultures through development of mathematics learning devices based on Riau folklore at elementary schools. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1538(1), 012066.
Richey, R. C., Klein, J. D., & Nelson, W. A. (2007). Developmental Research : Studies Of Instructional Design And Development.
Richmond, B., & Peterson, S. (2001). An introduction to systems thinking. High Performance Systems., Incorporated Lebanon, NH.
Rotherham, A. J., & Willingham, D. (2009). 21st century. Educational Leadership, 67(1), 16–21.
Saefurohman, S., Maryanti, R., Azizah, N. N., al Husaeni, D. F., Wulandary, V., & Irawan, A. R. (2021). Efforts to increasing numeracy literacy of elementary school students through quiziz learning media. ASEAN Journal of Science and Engineering Education, 1(3), 167–174.
Samo, D. D., & Kartasasmita, B. G. (2018). Culture-Based Contextual Learning to Increase Problem-Solving Ability of First Year University Student. Journal on Mathematics Education, 9(1), 81–94.
Saputro, A. D., Atun, S., Wilujeng, I., Ariyanto, A., & Arifin, S. (2020). Enhancing Pre-Service Elementary Teachers’ Self-Efficacy and Critical Thinking Using Problem-Based Learning. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(2), 765–773.
Sasmoko, G. N., Indrianti, Y., & Ronald Hermanus, D. (2021). Linen Assessment Apps: Artificial Intelligence Integration to develop Android-based applications that measure the" literacy, numeracy, entrepreneurial mindset" capacity of students in Indonesia. 2021 4th Artificial Intelligence and Cloud Computing Conference, 160–164.
Saxton, E., Burns, R., Holveck, S., Kelley, S., Prince, D., Rigelman, N., & Skinner, E. A. (2014a). A common measurement system for K-12 STEM education: Adopting an educational evaluation methodology that elevates theoretical foundations and systems thinking. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 40, 18–35.
Schelly, C., Anzalone, G., Wijnen, B., & Pearce, J. M. (2015). Open-source 3-D printing technologies for education: Bringing additive manufacturing to the classroom. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing, 28, 226–237.
Serevina, V., Astra, I., & Sari, I. J. (2018). Development of E-Module Based on Problem Based Learning (PBL) on Heat and Temperature to Improve Student’s Science Process Skill. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 17(3), 26–36.
Shurygin, V. Y., & Krasnova, L. A. (2016). Electronic Learning Courses as a Means to Activate Students’ Independent Work in Studying Physics. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(8), 1743–1751.
Sinaga, M. (2019). Implementation of innovative learning material to improve students competence on chemistry. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (IJPER), 53(1), 28–41.
Siswanto, J., Susantini, E., & Jatmiko, B. (2018). Practicality and effectiveness of the IBMR teaching model to improve physics problem solving skills. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(3), 381.
Sommerauer, P., & Müller, O. (2014). Augmented reality in informal learning environments: A field experiment in a mathematics exhibition. Computers & Education, 79, 59–68.
Stuntz, L. N., Lyneis, D. A., Richardson, G. P., Barcan, D., Costello, W., Fisher, D., Forrester, J., Heinbokel, J., Lyneis, D., Lyneis, J., Mons, J., Potash, J., Quaden, R., Richardson, G., Richmond, B., Stuntz, L., Ticotsky, A., & Weathers, L. (2001). Learner-Centered Learning in K-12 Education. Education, 2001.
Suryawati, E., & Osman, K. (2017). Contextual learning: Innovative approach towards the development of students’ scientific attitude and natural science performance. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(1), 61–76.
OECD. (2021). The Assessment Frameworks for Cycle 2 of the Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies. https://doi.org/10.1787/4bc2342d-en
Touchton, M. (2015). Flipping the classroom and student performance in advanced statistics: Evidence from a quasi-experiment. Journal of Political Science Education, 11(1), 28–44.
Trnova, E., & Trna, J. (2014). Implementation of creativity in science teacher training. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 5(3), 54–63.
Vachliotis, T., Salta, K., & Tzougraki, C. (2014). Meaningful understanding and systems thinking in organic chemistry: Validating measurement and exploring relationships. Research in Science Education, 44, 239–266.
Vanbecelaere, S., Cornillie, F., Sasanguie, D., Reynvoet, B., & Depaepe, F. (2021). The effectiveness of an adaptive digital educational game for the training of early numerical abilities in terms of cognitive, noncognitive and efficiency outcomes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(1), 112–124.
Wang, J., Jou, M., Lv, Y., & Huang, C.-C. (2018). An investigation on teaching performances of model-based flipping classroom for physics supported by modern teaching technologies. Computers in Human Behavior, 84, 36–48.
Weintrop, D., Beheshti, E., Horn, M., Orton, K., Jona, K., Trouille, L., & Wilensky, U. (2016). Defining computational thinking for mathematics and science classrooms. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25, 127–147.
Wong, G. K.-W., & Cheung, H.-Y. (2020). Exploring children’s perceptions of developing twenty-first century skills through computational thinking and programming. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(4), 438–450.
Wosilait, K., Heron, P. R. L., Shaffer, P. S., & Mcdermott, L. C. (2012). Addressing student difficulties in applying a wave model to the interference and diffraction of light to the interference and diffraction of light. 5(1999). https://doi.org/10.1119/1.19083
York, S., Lavi, R., Dori, Y. J., & Orgill, M. (2019). Applications of systems thinking in STEM education. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(12), 2742–2751.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Momentum: Physics Education Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Momentum: Physisc Education Journal allows readers to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of its articles and allow readers to use them for any other lawful purpose. 
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The Authors submitting a manuscript do so with the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to Momentum: Physics Education Journal
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
