Pendeteksian Fraud Pada Tata Kelola Penatausahaan Persediaan Badan Layanan Umum
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to analyze and interpret fraud detection on the governance of the BLU inventory administration of University X. This study uses a qualitative approach that focuses on the case study method with the interpretive paradigm. Inventory administration activities at the University of x are inseparable from various obstacles. Such as the lack of coordination between work units in each unit. The results show that inventory administration activities in the University X run less optimally. The finding reveals the problem of financial statement misstatement in the inventory account due to the inconsistency of the operator in entering the exit price (value) of the inventory. So when at the end of the period there is a significant difference in material value (material). The results of this study also provide information about the effectiveness of the accounting system
Downloads
Article Details
Authors who submit a manuscript understand that if the manuscript is accepted for publication, the copyright of the article shall be assigned to Jurnal Ekonomi Modernisasi (JEM).
References
Australian National Audit Office. (2015). Public Sector Financial Statements: High Quality Reporting Through Good Governance and Processes. Barton, ACT: Commonwealth of Australia.
Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological Paradigms and organisational Analysis - Elements of the Sociology of Corporate Life. Routledge.
Ibraraharie, Nanda, M., Ardini, Lilis, (2016). Mengungkap Kecurangan Pencatatan Persediaan Barang Studi Kasus Pada PT. Agung Aquatic Marine. Jurnal Ilmu dan Riset Akuntansi (JIRA), 5(10).
Kamayanti, A. (2016). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif Akuntansi Pengantar Reliogiositas Keilmuan. Jakarta Selatan: Yayasan Rumah Peneleh (Seri Media & Literasi).
Karim, Z. A., Said, J., & Bakri, H. H. M. (2015). An Exploratory Study on the Possibility of Assets Misappropriation among Royal Malaysian Police Officials. Procedia Economics and Finance, 31, 625-631.
Kranacher, M., Riley, R., & Wells, J. T. (2010). Forensic Accounting and Fraud Examination. Wiley.
Kurniati, E., Asmony, T., & Santoso, D. (2017). Kemelut Penatausahaan Aset Tetap (Dulu Hingga Kini). Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 8(3), 540–558.
Mardiasmo. (2004). Otonomi dan Manajemen Keuangan Daerah, Good Governence Democratization, Local Government Financial Management, Public Policy, Reinventing Government, Accountability Probity, Value for Money, Participatory Development, Serial Otonomi Daerah. Yogyakarta: Andi.
Milles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1992). Analisis Data Kualitatif (terjemahan). Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia.
Othman, R., Aris, N. A., Mardziyah, A., Zainan, N., & Amin, N. M. (2015). Fraud Detection and Prevention Methods in the Malaysian Public Sector: Accountants’ and Internal Auditors’ Perceptions. Procedia Economics and Finance, 28, 59-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01082-5
Rozmita & Nelly. (2012). Analisis faktor-faktor yang dapat mencegah fraud di lingkungan Perguruan Tinggi dalam upaya menciptakan good university governance (Studi Kasus Pada Perguruan Tinggi di Bandung). Laporan Penelitian, UPI Bandung.
Sukoharsono, E. G. (2006). Alternatif Riset Kualitatif Sains Akuntansi: Biografi, Phenomenologi, Grounded Theory, Critical Ethnografi dan Case Study. BPFE Universitas Brawijaya.
Tuanakotta, T. M. (2013). Audit Berbasis ISA (International Standards on Auditing). Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Tuanakotta, T. M. (2013). Mendeteksi Manipulasi Laporan Keuangan. Jakarta; Salemba Empat.
Yin, R. K. (2014). Studi Kasus Desain dan Metode. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.