Effectiveness of the AR-based EASI (exposure analogy social action impact writing) learning model on conceptual understanding of human motion systems in elementary schools
Keywords:
EASI learning model, conceptual understanding, augmented reality (AR), SOLO taxonomy, elementary schoolAbstract
Teaching abstract science concepts like the human motion system remains challenging in elementary schools. This study compared four learning models to improve students’ conceptual understanding: AR-integrated EASI, EASI without AR, AR-only, and conventional lecture–discussion. Using a quasi-experimental design, 120 sixth-graders from four Indonesian elementary schools were tested using SOLO Taxonomy-based instruments. Data were analyzed via ANOVA and Tukey HSD tests. Results showed significant differences among groups (p = 0.000). The EASI+AR model yielded the highest improvement (N-Gain = 0.7287) and significantly outperformed AR-only and conventional models. AR alone did not significantly enhance understanding. In conclusion, technology integration requires a solid pedagogical framework like EASI to effectively boost conceptual understanding. Practically, these findings imply that educators and curriculum developers must prioritize pedagogically-driven technology rather than standalone digital tools to optimize elementary science learning.
Downloads
References
Akçayır, M., & Akçayır, G. (2017). Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: A systematic review of the literature. Educational Research Review, 20, 1–11.
Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. C. (2001). Taxonomy for Assessing a Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Longman. https://www.uky.edu/~rsand1/china2018/texts/Anderson-Krathwohl - A taxonomy for learning teaching and assessing.pdf
Biggs, J. B., & Collins, K. (1982). Evaluating The Quality Of Learning: The SOLO Taxonomy. Academic Press.
Cheng, K.-H., & Tsai, C.-C. (2013). Affordances of augmented reality in science learning: Suggestions for future research. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(4), 449–462.
Creswell, J. W. (2023). Research design Research design. In Research in Social Science: Interdisciplinary Perspectives.
Economic Forum, W. (2023). Future of Jobs Report 2023. In The Future Of Homo. https://doi.org/10.1142/11458
Fauziah, A., Hasibuan, M. F., & Yendrawaty. (2024). Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Murid Pada Pelajaran Ipa Dengan Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Visual, Auditori, Kinestheti(Vak) Pada Materi Sistem Gerak Manusia Di Kelas Vi Sd Negeri 067241 Medan Denai. Didaktik : Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD FKIP Universitas Mandiri, 10, 1–23.
Habibi, C., & Sulistyanto, S. H. (2016). Pengembangan Media Augmented Reality Sebagai Alat Bantu Edukasi Pada Pembelajaran Sistem Pernafasan Manusia.
Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809
Henne, A., Syskowski, S., Krug, M., Möhrke, P., Thoms, L. J., & Huwer, J. (2024). How to Evaluate Augmented Reality Embedded in Lesson Planning in Teacher Education. Education Sciences, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14030264
Hsu, H. P., Cheah, Y. H., & Hughes, J. E. (2023). A Case Study of a Secondary Biology Teacher’s Pedagogical Reasoning and Action with Augmented Reality Technology. Education Sciences, 13(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13111080
Ibáñez, M.-B., & Delgado-Kloos, C. (2018). Augmented reality for STEM learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 123, 109–123.
Lyesmaya, D., Musthafa, B., Sunendar, D., Rahman, & Fahrurrozzi, F. (2023). The E-A-S-I (Exposure-Analogy Visual-Social Action-Impact Writing) Learning Model: Improving Reflective Writing Skills and Developing Values in Elementary School through Wayang Sukuraga. PrimaryEdu : Journal of Primary Education, 7(2), 254–265. https://doi.org/10.22460/pej.v7i2.4124
Mayer, R. E. (2002). Multimedia Learning. In Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning (Vol. 41). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_285
Meilindawati, R., Zainuri, Z., & Hidayah, I. (2023). Penerapan Media Pembelajaran Augmented Reality (Ar) Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Jurnal E-DuMath, 9(1), 55–62. https://doi.org/10.52657/je.v9i1.1941
Nauko, Y. S., & Amali, L. N. (2021). Pengenalan Anatomi Tubuh Menggunakan Teknologi Augmented Reality Berbasis Android. Jambura Journal of Informatics, 3(2), 66–76. https://doi.org/10.37905/jji.v3i2.11720
Novanto, Y. S., Djudin, T., T, A. Y., Basith, A., & Murdani, E. (2023). Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Ipa Pada Murid Sekolah Dasar Berdasarkan Gender. JPDI (Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Indonesia), 8(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.26737/jpdi.v8i1.4260
OECD. (2019). What Students Know And Can Do: Vol. I. https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en
Papanastasiou, G., Drigas, A., Skianis, C., Lytras, M., & Papanastasiou, E. (2019). Virtual and augmented reality effects on K-12, higher and tertiary education students’ twenty-first century skills. Virtual Reality, 23(4), 425–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-018-0363-2
Vygotsky, L. S. (1980). Mind in Society. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic License.
Jurnal Bidang Pendidikan Dasar allows readers to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of its articles and allow readers to use them for any other lawful purpose. The Authors submitting a manuscript do so with the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to Jurnal Bidang Pendidikan Dasar