EUPHEMICTIC EXPRESSION IN THE REPORTING OF SEXUAL HARASSEMENT ON THE INSTAGRAM ACCOUNT ‘INSIDE LOMBOK’
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research analyzes the types and social functions of euphemistic expressions used in the reporting of sexual harassment cases on the ‘Inside Lombok’ Instagram account. This research uses a qualitative descriptive method with a discourse analysis approach. Data were obtained from captions and Instagram posts related to sexual harassment cases. The research results show that there are eight types of euphemisms used, namely substitution, orthographic variation, circumlocution, generalization, technical terms, abbreviation, metaphor, and understatement. Among all these types, circumlocution is the most dominant, indicating a tendency for the media to use indirect expressions in conveying sensitive information. Additionally, this study found four main social functions of euphemisms, namely namely identity protection, censorship evasion and conformity with digital platforms, discourse neutralization and prevention of collective stigmatization, and interpretation management and public perception building. This study concludes that euphemisms in digital media reporting not only function as a strategy of linguistic politeness but also as a discursive tool that influences public representation and understanding of the issue of sexual harassment on social media.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
JIBS (Jurnal Ilmiah Bahasa dan Sastra) allows readers to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of its articles and allow readers to use them for any other lawful purpose. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions. Finally, the journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic License.
References
Ahmed, A., and Jomaa, N. 2022. “Euphemistic Expressions in the American Mass Media: A Qualitative Study of Types and Functions.” Eurasian Journal of English Language and Literature 4(2):65–77.
Allan, K., and Burridge, K. 1991. “Renews Automatically with Continued Use. Page — (1/298) Euphemism & Dysphemism : Language Used as Shield and Weapon.” doi:https://doi.org/10.52166/edulitics.v4i1.1567.
Andreas M. Kaplan and Michael Haenlein. 2010. “Users of the World, Unite! The Challenges and Opportunities of Social Media.” Business Horizons. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003.
Creswell, J. W. and Poth, C. N. 2018. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches.
Cuklanz, L. M., and Moorti, S. 2009. Local Violence, Global Media: Feminist Analyses of Gendered Representations. Peter Lang.
Cuklanz and Moorti. 2006. “Fractured Fairy Tales and Fragmented Markets: Disney’s Weddings of a Lifetime and the Cultural Politics of Media Conglomeration.”
Dewi, E. E., Huda, K., and Supriyatno. 2019. “An Analysis of Euphemism in Online Written Mass Media in Indonesia.” Edulitics Journal. 4(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.52166/edulitics.v4i1.1567.
Fairclough. 1995. “Media Discourse.”Edward Arnold.
Fileborn, B., and Loney-Howes, R. 2019. #MeToo and the Politics of Social Change. Palgrave Macmillan.
Gorwa, R., Binns, R., and Katzenbach, C. 2020. “Algorithmic Content Moderation: Technical and Political Challenges in the Automation of Platform Governance.” Big Data & Society 7(1):1–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951719897945.
Lutzky and Kehoe. 2020. “Referring to Taboos: Euphemisms and Dysphemisms in Online Discourse.”
Richardson, J. E. 2007. Analysing Newspapers: An Approach from Critical Discourse Analysis. Palgrave Macmillan.
Sandelowski, M. 2000. “Whatever Happened to Qualitative Description?”. Research in Nursing & Health. 23(4). doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-240X(200008)23:4<334::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-G.
Vessey Rachelle. 2024. “The Language of Sexual Violence and Impropriety A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Linguistic Study.”
Allan, K., and Burridge, K. 2006. Forbidden Words: Taboo and the Censoring of Language. Cambridge University Press.