Eksistensi UPICC Sebagai Instrumen Soft Law dalam Praktik Perdagangan Internasional

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Feb 17, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21067/jph.v6i2.6009
Keywords:
International trade; soft law; UPICC

Main Article Content

Gita Gea
a:1:{s:5:"en_US";s:22:"University of Surabaya";}

Abstract

International trade practice is based on international treaties or agreements. Treaties in international law paradigm on its development now distinguished on the form of hard law or soft law. Soft law is identical with its characteristic as a legal instrument that has no juridical binding power. UPICC as a legal instrument on international trade sector tries to harmonize the international trade law but it has the nature of soft law. This paper aims to examine the purpose of UPICC existence on its effort of harmonizing the diversity of international trade law while its characteristic is defined as a soft law. Based on this research that was conducted by juridical-normative method, it is understood that the characteristic of UPICC as a soft law makes it as legal instrument that is able to adapt with the development of international trade law also to become the reference on reforming the international trade law.

Article Details

How to Cite
Gea, G. (2022). Eksistensi UPICC Sebagai Instrumen Soft Law dalam Praktik Perdagangan Internasional . Jurnal Panorama Hukum, 6(2), 93–103. https://doi.org/10.21067/jph.v6i2.6009
Issue
Vol. 6 No. 2 (2021): Desember
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

Adolf, H. (2004). Hukum Perdagangan Internasional: Prinsip Prinsip-prinsip dan Konsepsi Dasar. Bandung: PT Rajawali Pers.

Albayumi. F. (2012). Soft Law Sebagai Sebuah Strategi: Studi Kasus Piagam ASEAN (ASEAN Charter). SPEKTRUM Jurnal Ilmu Politik Hubungan Internasional. 12(2).

Aprita S. dan R. Adhitya. (2020). Hukum Perdagangan Internasional. Depok: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Gabriel, H.D. (2009). The Advantages of Soft Law in International Commercial Law: The Role of UNIDROIT, UNCITRAL, and the Hague Conference. Brooklyn Journal of International Law. 34(3), 655-672.

Copyright © 2020, JPH, e-ISSN: 2528-1992, p-ISSN: 2527- 6654

Guzman, A.T. and T.L. Meyer. (2010) International Soft Law. The Journal of Legal Analysis 2(1), 171-225.

Hutabarat, S. (2016). Harmonisasi Hukum Kontrak dan Dampaknya Pada Hukum Kontrak Indonesia. Veritas et Justitia Jurnal Ilmu Hukum. 2(1),112-134.

Hillgenberg, H. (1999). A Fresh Look at Soft Law. EJIL 10(3), 499-515.

Jiang, L. (2009). “An Evaluation of Soft Law as a Method for Regulating Public Procurement from a Trade Perspectiveâ€. Thesis submitted to the University of Nottingham for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.

Konvensi Wina Tahun 1969 Tentang Perjanjian Internasional.

Mandala, S. (2017). UPICC Sebagai Model Bagi Pembaruan Hukum Kontrak Indonesia

Marzuki, P.M. (2011). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Supancana, I.B.R. (2012). Perkembangan Hukum Kontrak Dagang Internasional. Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional.

Sutrisno, N. (1995). Harmonisasi Hukum Perdagangan Internastional. UNISIA No. 26 Tahun XV Triwulan II, 37-43. Statuta Mahkamah Internasional.

UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts.