Reframing the earth science handbook to cultivate pre-service teachers’ generic science skills and problem-solving

Authors

  • Ni Made Pujani Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Indonesia
  • Ketut Suma Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Indonesia
  • Putu Prima Juniartina Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Indonesia
  • Putu Hari Sudewa Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Indonesia
  • Ni Luh Putu Mery Marlinda Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Indonesia
  • Bartolomeus Kristi Brahmantia Putra Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Indonesia
  • Gusti Ngurah Andika Prayoga Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Indonesia
  • Komang Chandra Maharani Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21067/mpej.v10i1.13890

Keywords:

Earth Science, Generic science skills, Handbook, Inquiry, Problem-solving

Abstract

The highly contextual nature of Earth Science content in relation to students requires teachers to possess strong generic science skills and problem-solving abilities to ensure optimal knowledge transfer in the learning process. This study aimed to conduct a needs analysis to inform the design of the Earth Science handbook and to evaluate their validity, practicality, and readability. This research is part of a two-year Research and Development (R&D) project. In the first year, the development of teaching materials employed the 4D model, limited to three stages: define, design, and develop. The define stage began with an analysis of students’ needs regarding Earth Science teaching materials through literature review and field observations. The design stage involved organizing chapters, constructs, and content of the materials based on the results of the needs analysis. The output of this stage was the initial draft of the teaching materials. The development stage included expert-judgment validation, practicality testing by lecturer-practitioners, and readability testing by students. The results indicated that the developed Earth Science teaching materials were categorized as highly valid (Gregory’s Index = 1.00), highly practical (mean score = 3.73), and excellent readability (mean score = 3.66). This study concludes that Earth Science teaching materials are needed to enhance students’ generic science skills and problem-solving abilities. The developed materials are feasible for dissemination and effectiveness testing. The findings provide practical implications for improving Earth Science instruction and support the development of competency-based learning aligned with 21st-century educational demands.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Apriyani, Rany, Taufik Ramlan Ramalis, and Irma Rahma Suwarma. 2019. “Analyzing Student ’ s Problem Solving Abilities of Direct Current Electricity in STEM-Based Learning.” Journal of Science Learning 2(3). doi: 10.17509/jsl.v2i3.17559.

Clarke, Camray. 2025. “Teen Scientists Propel SA on World Stage by Developing Solutions to Global Challenges.” Eyewiness News 1. Retrieved February 6, 2026 (https://www.ewn.co.za/2025/12/22/teen-scientists-propel-sa-on-world-stage-by-developing-solutions-to-global-challenges).

Diana, Sri, and Rampeng. 2023. “content validity analysis of chemical engineering students ’ needs questionnaires for english reading materials development.” Klasikal: Journal of Education, Language Teaching and Science 5(2):254–63.

Faradilla, M., M. Hasan, and Sulastri. 2018. “The Effectiveness of Guided Inquiry-Based Student Worksheets on Students ’ Generic Science Skills.” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series.

Hariyanto, Bambang, Ita Mz, Wiwik Su, and Rindawati. 2022. “4D Model Learning Device Development Method of the Physical Geography Field Work Guidance Book.” in MATEC: Web of Conferences. Vol. 372.

Haviz, M., H. Karomah, R. Delfita, M. I. A. Umar, and I. M. Maris. 2018. “revisiting generic science skills as 21 st century skills on biology learning.” Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia 7(3):355–63. doi: 10.15294/jpii.v7i3.12438.

Herayanti, Lovy, and Baiq Azmi Sukroyanti. 2022. “The Development of Inquiry-Based Teaching Materials to Improve Physics Teacher ’ s Conseptual Understanding.” Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA 8(6):3110–16. doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v8i6.2543.

Husnaini, Siti Jamiatul, and Sufen Chen. 2019. “Effects of Guided Inquiry Virtual and Physical Laboratories on Conceptual Understanding, Inquiry Performance, Scientific Inquiry Self-Efficacy, and Enjoyment.” Physical Review Physics Education Research. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.010119.

Jääskelä, Päivikki, Seija Nykänen, and Päivi Tynjälä. 2018. “Models for the Development of Generic Skills in Finnish Higher Education.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 42(1):130–42. doi: 10.1080/0309877X.2016.1206858.

Khabibah, Elok Norma, Mohammad Masyukri, and Maridi. 2017. “The Analysis of Generic Science Skills of High School Students.” Pp. 251–56 in Atlantis Press. Vol. 158.

Khoiri, N., C. Huda, A. Rusilowati, and A. G. C. Wicaksono. 2020. “the impact of guided inquiry learning with digital swing model on students ’ generic science skill.” Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia 9(4):554–60. doi: 10.15294/jpii.v9i4.26644.

Lin, X., W. Yang, L. Wu, L. Zhu, D. Wu, and H. Li. 2021. “Using an Inquiry- Based Science and Engineering Program to Promote Science Knowledge, Problem-Solving Skills and Approaches to Learning in Preschool Children.” Early Education and Development 32(5).

Mahmudi, Haris, and Sentot Kusairi. 2019. “Problem-Solving Learning Influence on Physics Learning Outcomes Based on Logical Thinking Ability.” Momentum: Physics Education Journal 3(1):13–20.

Maksimilianus, Yustinus, Dhey Nesi, Sentot Kusairi, Arrika Wifqotu, and Lailin Nafisah. 2022. “Analysis of Student Perceptions of Problem-Solving Learning and Peer Assessment.” Momentum: Physics Education Journal 6(1):73–85.

Mclaughlin, Jessica A., and Janelle M. Bailey. 2023. “Students Need More Practice with Spatial Thinking in Geoscience Education : A Systematic Review of the Literature.” Studies in Science Education 59(2):147–204. doi: 10.1080/03057267.2022.2029305.

Nastiti, Luvia R., Idha Sunarno, Sukarmin, Sulistyo Saputro, and Luqman Baehaqi. 2024. “improving stem literacy through project-based geoscience learning ( pjbgl ) model.” Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists 23(4):694–709.

Pujani, N. M., K. G. Y. Arsana, K. Suma, K. Selamet, and N. Erlina. 2022. “the effectiveness of introduction to astronomy teaching materials to improve problem-solving and generic science skills.” Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia 11(2):333–40. doi: 10.15294/jpii.v11i2.34801.

Pujani, N. M., K. Suma, W. Sadia, and A. F. C. Wijaya. 2018. “Applying Collaborative Ranking Tasks to Improve Students’ Concept Mastery and Generic Science Skills.” Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia. doi: 10.15294/jpii.v7i3.14304.

Pujani, Ni Made, Putu Prima Juniartina, Putu Hari Sudewa, Ni Luh Putu Mery Marlinda, and Bartolomeus Kristi Brahmantia Putra. 2025. “The Impact of Contextual Problem-Based Materials on Students’ Disaster Mitigation Concept Mastery and Critical Thinking.” International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies 8(3):4775–84. doi: 10.53894/ijirss.v8i3.7610.

Putra, B. K. B., B. A. Prayitno, and Maridi. 2018. “The Effectiveness of Guided Inquiry and Instad towards Students’ Critical Thinking Skills on Circulatory System Materials.” Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia 7(4):476–82. doi: 10.15294/jpii.v7i4.14302.

Rahmah, A., Mardiyana, and D. R. S. Saputro. 2021. “High School Students ’ Mathematical Problem Solving Skills Based on Krulik and Rudnick Steps Reviewed from Thinking Style.” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series.

Razali, A. Halim, A. G. Haji, and E. Nurfadilla. 2020. “Effect of Inquiry Learning Methods on Generic Science Skills Based on Creativity Level.” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series.

Sarini, Putri, and Kompyang Selamet. 2019. “Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Etnosains Bali Bagi Calon Guru IPA.” Wahana Matematika Dan Sains : Jurnal Matematika , Sains , Dan Pembelajarannya 13(1):27–39.

Sasidharan, Thampi Keerthi Prabhakar Padmarudram, Ponathong Chakrit, and Yongsorn Chatupol. 2023. “Critical thinking skills and dispositions : perceptions of higher education students in thailand.” Journal of Education and Innovation 26(3):153–67.

Sudarmin, S., Woro Sumarni, Laily Zahro, Pawestri Farah Diba, and Asfia Rosita. 2018. “The Development of Chemistry Learning Module Integrated with Green Chemistry and Ethnoscience to Develop Students’ Generic Science Skills and Soft Skills.” Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in Southest Asia 41.

Tanjung, Yul Ifda, Festiyed, Skunda Diliarosta, Jubaidah, and Aditya Putra Sanjaya. 2024. “Analysis of Students’ Problem Solving Skills Based on Heller ’s Indicator.” Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction 14(4):421–33. doi: 10.47750/pegegog.14.04.40.

Trianung, Teguh, Djoko Susanto, Riza Ramadhani Solihin, Eka Puji Fauziyah, Nur Vita, Irma Yanti, and Andita Putri Ramadhania. 2024. “The efforts of indonesian government in increasing teacher quality based on pisa result in 2022 : a literature review.” PERSPEKTIF Ilmu Pendidikan 38(1):57–65.

Wahyuni, Mustika. 2025. “IBMR-Based Physics e-Book : Enhancing Multi-Representation and Problem-Solving Ability.” Momentum: Physics Education Journal 9(2). doi: 10.21067/mpej.v9i2.10898.

Yosepha, Anita, Mohammad Ali, Dinn Wahyudin, and Rusman. 2023. “The Role of Multi-Dimensional Curriculum Design in Improving Higher-Order Thinking Skills.” International Journal of Learning, Teaching, and Educational Research 22(7):219–39.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-30

How to Cite

Pujani, N. M., Suma, K., Juniartina, P. P., Sudewa, P. H., Marlinda, N. L. P. M., Putra, B. K. B., … Maharani, K. C. (2026). Reframing the earth science handbook to cultivate pre-service teachers’ generic science skills and problem-solving. Momentum: Physics Education Journal, 10(1), 198–213. https://doi.org/10.21067/mpej.v10i1.13890

Issue

Section

Articles