IBMR-based physics e-book: Enhancing multi-representation and problem-solving ability

Mustika Wahyuni; Jumadi Jumadi

doi:10.21067/mpej.v9i2.10898

Authors

Mustika Wahyuni Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Jumadi Jumadi Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21067/mpej.v9i2.10898

Keywords:

problem solving, multiple representation, Investigation Based Multiple Representation (IBMR), Physics E-Book, High school student

Abstract

Problem-solving and multi-representation abilities are essential competencies for 21st-century students, especially in physics. The use of teaching materials based on effective learning models and technology can enhance these abilities. This study aims to: develop an IBMR-based physics e-book (Investigation Based Multiple Representation) that is deemed feasible by experts, and evaluate its effectiveness in improving students’ problem-solving and multi-representation abilities. This study employs the ADDIE development model, which includes analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. A total of 48 students from a state Islamic senior high school (MAN) in Yogyakarta were randomly selected as research subjects. Data collection instruments included validation sheets, questionnaires, and tests for multi-representation and problem-solving abilities. Feasibility analysis was conducted descriptively, practicality and student response tests used ideal standard deviation, test instrument validation used Aiken’s V equation and item analysis using Item Response Theory (IRT), and effectiveness testing used MANOVA. The results showed that the IBMR-based physics e-book is feasible for use in physics learning, with validator assessments in the “Feasible” category and student responses in the “Very Good” category. Although it was not effective in improving multi-representation abilities, this e-book significantly enhanced problem-solving abilities, particularly in the evaluation aspect and the indicator of converting verbal representations to pictorial forms.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adu‐Gyamfi, K., Stiff, L. V., & Bossé, M. J. (2012). Lost in translation: Examining translation errors associated with mathematical representations. School Science and Mathematics, 112(3), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00129.x

Ainsworth, S. (1999). The functions of multiple representations. Computers & Education, 33(2–3), 131–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(99)00029-9

Akour, M., & Alenezi, M. (2022). Higher education future in the era of digital transformation. Education Sciences, 12(11), 784. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12110784

Am, Muh. A., & Istiyono, E. (2022). Multiple representation ability of high school students in physics: A study of modern response theory. THABIEA: Journal of Natural Science Teaching, 5(1), 85–100. https://doi.org/10.21043/thabiea.v5i1.12550

Arikunto, S. (2009). Dasar-dasar evaluasi pendidikan (Edisi revisi). Bumi Aksara.

Arzak, K. A., & Prahani, B. K. (2023). The physics problem solving skills profile of high school students in elasticity material and the implementation of augmented reality book-assisted PBL model. Momentum: Physics Education Journal, 7(1), 66–77. https://doi.org/10.21067/mpej.v7i1.6704

Azwar, S. (2022). Penyusunan skala psikologi (Edisi 2). Pustaka Pelajar.

Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan. (2014). Instrumen penilaian buku teks pelajaran. Kementerian Riset dan Teknologi Pendidikan Tinggi.

Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09506-6

Campos, E., Zavala, G., Zuza, K., & Guisasola, J. (2019). Electric field lines: The implications of students’ interpretation on their understanding of the concept of electric field and of the superposition principle. American Journal of Physics, 87(8), 660–667. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.5100588

Cheng, K. H., Chou, C. Y., & Wu, H. K. (2019). The effects of interactive e-books on students’ achievement and intrinsic motivation in elementary schools. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(7), 933-949. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1474235

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education (5th ed.). Routledge.

Delice, A., & Sevimli, E. (2010). An investigation of the pre-services teachers’ ability of using multiple representations in problem-solving success: The case of definite integral. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 10(1), 137–149.

Eriyanti, I. L., & Rosiningtias, W. (2023). Development e-modules based android in Newton’s law topic for senior high school. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 9(1), 62–72. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v9i1.50313

Dibyasakti, B. A., Rahayu, G. R., & Suhoyo, Y. (2013). Tingkat pelaksanaan problem-based learning di Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Gadjah Mada berdasarkan pembelajaran konstruktif, mandiri, kolaboratif, dan kontekstual. Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia: The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education, 2(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.25142

Fadlli, M. R., Sutopo, S., & Wartono, W. (2019). Analisis kesulitan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal Hukum Newton. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 4(8), 993-1002. https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v4i8.12652

Faradila, A., Mahardika, I. K., & Bektiarso, S. (2022). Analisis kemampuan representasi matematik dan gambar siswa SMAN 1 Jember pada materi suhu dan kalor. Jurnal Phi: Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Fisika Terapan, 3(4), 146-154. https://doi.org/10.22373/p-jpft.v3i4.14645

Furqon, M., & Muslim. (2019). Investigating the ability of multiple representations and scientific consistency of high school students on Newton’s laws. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1,280(5), 052041. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1280/5/052041

Gagatsis, A., & Shiakalli, M. (2004). Ability to translate from one representation of the concept of function to another and mathematical problem solving. Educational Psychology, 24(5), 645–657. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341042000262953

Gunawan, G., Harjono, A., Nisyah, M., & Kusdiastuti, M. (2020). Improving students’ problem-solving skills using inquiry learning model combined with advance organizer. International Journal of Instruction, 13(4), 427–442. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13427a

Hammond, L., & Flook, L. (2020). Teaching for meaningful learning in the digital age. Harvard Education Press.

Harra Hau, R. R., Mole, P. N., Elizabeth, A., Dua, Y. S., & Leonarda, M. Y. (2020). Students’ multirepresentation ability in completing physics evaluation problems. JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika), 5(3), 187–196. https://doi.org/10.26737/jipf.v5i3.1893

Hasibuan, S. A., Fauzi, K. M. A., & Mukhtar, M. (2019). Development of PISA mathematical problem model on the content of change and relationship to measure students’ mathematical problem-solving ability. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(2), 45-58. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/6274

Hidayah, N., Yulianti, S., Puspita, L., & Haka, N. B. (2022). Analisis kemampuan representasi visual melalui model pembelajaran TPS. Biodik: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Biologi, 8(3), 173-181. https://doi.org/10.22437/bio.v8i3.17817

Hijriani, & Amiruddin, H. (2021). Analisis kesulitan belajar dalam memecahkan masalah fisika pada materi Hukum Newton tentang gerak. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Tadulako Online, 9(1), 45-49.

Iivari, N., Sharma, S., & Ventä-Olkkonen, L. (2020). Digital transformation of everyday life – How COVID-19 pandemic transformed the basic education of the young generation and why information management research should care? International Journal of Information Management, 55, Article 102183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102183

Ince, E. (2018). An overview of problem-solving studies in physics education. Journal of Education and Learning, 7(4), 191-200. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v7n4p191

Jatmiko, B., Prahani, B. K., Saphira, H. V., Siswanto, J., & Universitas PGRI Semarang. (2024). Investigation-based multiple representation online model to improve students’ problem-solving skills. Perspectives of Science and Education, 69(3), 621-636. https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2024.3.38

Liputo, K., & Purwaningsih, E. (2022). Efektivitas model pengajaran IBMR (Investigation-Based-Multiple-Representation) berbantuan video pembelajaran terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah fisika di SMA. Jurnal MIPA dan Pembelajarannya, 3(2), 209-216. https://doi.org/10.17977/um067v2i3p209-216

Mardapi, D. (2012). Pengukuran, penilaian, dan evaluasi pendidikan. Nuha Medika.

Masrifah, M., Setiawan, A., Sinaga, P., & Setiawan, W. (2018). Investigasi kemampuan representasi grafik mahasiswa fisika pada konsep hukum Newton. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 3(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.33387/saintifik.v3i2.1133

Murshed, M., Phang, F. A., & Bunyamin, M. A. H. (2021). Transformation of multiple representation in real world physics problem solving. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1760(1), 012004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1760/1/012004

Mustajab, A., Bahri, S., & Julyanto, Y. (2020). 7-step PBL: Problem solving ability of students in work and energy. JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika), 5(3), 169-178. https://doi.org/10.26737/jipf.v5i3.169

Ndoa, Y. A. A., & Jumadi. (2022). Physics e-book based on STEM integrated modelling instruction in circular motion. Journal of Education Technology, 6(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v6i4.48680

Ningrum, D. J., Mahardika, I. K., & Gani, A. A. (2015). Pengaruh model quantum teaching dengan metode praktikum terhadap kemampuan multirepresentasi siswa pada mata pelajaran fisika kelas X di SMA Plus Darul Hikmah. Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika, 4(2), 187-196.

Novita, R., Zulkardi, Z., & Hartono, Y. (2012). Exploring primary students’ problem-solving ability by doing tasks like PISA’s questions. Journal on Mathematics Education, 3(2), 133-150. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.3.2.571.133-150

OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en

Pebriana, I. N., Supahar, S., Pradana, P. W., & Mundilarto, M. (2022). Investigating multiple representations ability of high school students on linear motion. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 665, 232-237. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220129.042

Prahani, B. K., Deta, U. A., Lestari, N. A., Yantidewi, M., M. N. R., Kelelufna, V. P., Siswanto, J., Misbah, M., Mahtari, S., & Suyidno, S. (2021). A profile of physics multiple representation ability of senior high school students on heat material. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1760(1), 012020. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1760/1/012020

Qureshi, M. I., Khan, N., Raza, H., Imran, A., & Ismail, F. (2021). Digital technologies in Education 4.0: Does it enhance the effectiveness of learning? A systematic literature reviews. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 15(04), Article 31. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v15i04.20291

Rachmawati, O. Q., Prahani, K. B., & Husni, M. (2022). Profile of students’ physics problem-solving skills and implementation of Quizizz-based Team Games Tournament (QTGT) method in physics learning. JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika), 7(1), 82-93. https://doi.org/10.26737/jipf.v7i1.2479

Rahmatullah, A. S., Mulyasa, E., Syahrani, S., Pongpalilu, F., & Putri, R. E. (2022). Digital era 4.0: The contribution to education and student psychology. Linguistics and Culture Review, 6(S3), 89-107. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v6nS3.2064

Ronita, A., & Putra, A. (2024). Analysis of student difficulties in solving questions Newton’s law of motion at State SMAN 1 Ranah Batahan. Pillar of Physics Education, 17(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.24036/13847171074

Safitri, D., Awalia, S., Sekaringtyas, T., Nuraini, S., Lestari, I., Suntari, Y., Marini, A., Iskandar, R., & Sudrajat, A. (2022). Improvement of student learning motivation through word-wall-based digital game media. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 16(06), 189. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v16i06.25729

Santika, I. W. D., Parwati, N. N., & Divayana, D. G. H. (2020). Pengaruh model pembelajaran berbasis masalah dalam setting pembelajaran daring terhadap prestasi belajar matematika dan kemampuan pemecahan masalah siswa kelas X SMA. Jurnal Teknologi Pembelajaran Indonesia, 10(2), 339-354. https://doi.org/10.23887/jtpi.v10i2.3397

Sari, Y., Rokhmat, J., & Hikmawati, H. (2020). Pengaruh model pembelajaran kausalitik terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah fisika peserta didik. GeoScienceEd Journal, 1(1), 37-47. https://doi.org/10.29303/goescienceedu.v1i1.37

Setyarini, D. A., Imam Supardi, Z. A., & Elok, S. (2021). Improving senior high school students’ physics problem-solving skills through investigation-based multiple representation (IBMR) learning model. IJORER: International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 2(1), 42-53. https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v2i1.74

Siswanto, J. (2019). Implementasi model IBMR berbantu PhET simulation untuk meningkatkan kemampuan representasi pada pembelajaran fisika. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika, 10(2), 96-100. https://doi.org/10.26877/jp2f.v10i2.4437

Susanti, A., Diani, R., Satiarti, R. B., Munawaroh, R., & Fujiani, D. (2021). Blended learning model: The effect on physics problem-solving skills viewed from self-efficacy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1796(1), 012014. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1796/1/012014

Tenzin, D. (2019). Improvement of physics numerical problem-solving skills of students in Bhutan. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 4(3), 30-42. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2019/v4i330120

Theasy, Y., Wiyanto, & Sujarwata. (2018). Multi-representation ability of students on the problem-solving physics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 983, 012005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/983/1/012005

Ubaidillah, M. (2019). Analisis kesalahan mahasiswa dalam menyelesaikan soal representasi visual pada materi optika geometri. PSEJ (Pancasakti Science Education Journal), 4(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.24905/psej.v4i1.50

Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st century competences: Implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299-321. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2012.668938

Widihastuti. (2007). Efektivitas pelaksanaan KBK SMK N Program Keahlian Busana di Yogyakarta ditinjau dari pencapaian kompetensi siswa [Skripsi, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta].