Exploration of various visual media (real and virtual) in physics learning

Rifal Ramadhan Rifal; Andi Suhandi; Achmad Samsudin; Lina Aviyanti

doi:10.21067/mpej.v9i2.11449

Authors

Rifal Ramadhan Rifal Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
Andi Suhandi Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
Achmad Samsudin Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
Lina Aviyanti Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21067/mpej.v9i2.11449

Keywords:

variety of visual media, physics, learning, real, virtual

Abstract

This study aims to explore the role of visual media in physics learning especially in static electricity and capacitors, and to identify the obstacles faced by teachers in using these visual media. This study uses a qualitative descriptive approach with a literature review and analysis of data obtained through a questionnaire distributed to high school physics teachers in Bandung City. The data collected includes the use of various types of visual media, the purpose of their use, students' responses to visual media, and the obstacles faced in their implementation. The findings show that visual media such as PowerPoint, digital simulation (PhET), and animated videos are very effective in physics learning to help students understand abstract concepts, especially in capacitor material. Digital simulation, with an effectiveness rate of 82.4%, proved to be the most effective in explaining the concept of capacitors. The use of this visual media also has a positive impact on student motivation in learning. However, the main obstacles faced are the limitations of time, facilities, and technical skills of teachers in developing visual media. In conclusion, although the use of visual media is very beneficial, further support in the form of training, provision of facilities, and better time management is needed to optimize the application of visual media in physics learning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdulrahaman, M. D., Ayob, A., & Sulaiman, T. (2020). Multimedia tools for learning and teaching. Education and Information Technologies, 25(4), 3145–3167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-03338-3

Abrahams, I., & Millar, R. (2008). Does practical work really work? A study of the effectiveness of practical work as a teaching and learning method in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 30(14), 1945–1969. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701749305

Ayres, P. (2015). Multimedia learning: Theory and research. Cambridge University Press.

Boote, D. N., & Beile, P. (2005). Scholars before researchers: On the centrality of the dissertation literature review in research preparation. Educational Researcher, 34(6), 3–15.

Cabural, A. B. (2024). Enhancing conceptual understanding of electricity and magnetism through VR simulations. International Journal of Current Science Research and Review, 7(10), 7909–7917.

Chandrasegaran, A. L., Treagust, D. F., & Mocerino, M. (2008). Visualization in science education. Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6593-1

Cordova, D., López, M., & García, R. (2014). Misconceptions in science learning: A challenge in physics education. International Journal of Science Education, 36(12), 2234–2245.

Davidowitz, B., & Chidlow, A. (2010). Demonstrative experiments in physics teaching. Physics Education, 45(3), 339–348. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/45/3/005

Davidowitz, B., Chigona, A., & Gouws, A. (2010). Demonstrative experiments in physics teaching. Physics Education, 45(3), 274–280. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/45/3/009

de Jong, T., Linn, M. C., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2013). Physical and virtual laboratories in science and engineering education. Science, 340(6130), 305–308. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1230579

Finkelstein, N. D., Adams, W. K., Keller, C. J., Perkins, K. K., Wieman, C. E., & LeMaster, R. (2005). When learning about the real world is better done virtually: A study of substituting computer simulations for laboratory equipment. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 1(1), 010103.

Flath, C. M., Wiemeyer, J., & Rosenberg, J. (2019). Virtual models and their applications in education and industry. Journal of Virtual Reality and Broadcasting, 16(3), 45–67. https://doi.org/10.17192/jvrb.2019.16.3.45

Greace, J. T., & Moreira, M. A. (2000). The role of conceptual models in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 22(10), 987–998. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690050033406

Harrison, A. G., & Coll, R. K. (2008). Analogy in the teaching of science: A review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 30(12), 1601–1624. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802250296

Hestenes, D. (1996). Modeling methodology for physics teachers. The Physics Teacher, 34(1), 25–31. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2345222

Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88(1), 28–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10106

Husnaini, S. J., & Chen, S. (2019). The effectiveness of guided inquiry-based virtual laboratories to improve students' conceptual understanding and inquiry skills. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15(1), 010119.

Juriševič, M., Kolar, R., & Novak, S. (2008). The use of dynamic models in teaching of physics. European Journal of Physics Education, 29(4), 43–50.

Kuhlthau, C. C. (2004). Seeking meaning: A process approach to library and information services (2nd ed.). Libraries Unlimited.

Laudon, K. C., & Laudon, J. P. (2020). Management information systems: Managing the digital firm (16th ed.). Pearson Education.

Marshall, J. A., & Young, E. S. (2006). Interactive teaching and hands-on experiments in physics education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-006-0354-y

Mayer, R. E. (2017). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Pritsker, M. (2006). The Journal of Visualized Experiments (JoVE): A video-based scientific journal. Journal of Visualized Experiments, (1), e1. https://doi.org/10.3791/1

Rutten, N., van Joolingen, W. R., & van der Veen, J. T. (2012). The learning effects of computer simulations in science education. Computers & Education, 58(1), 136–153.

Schumacher, C., & Sorger, M. (2021). The role of virtual models in industrial and educational applications. International Journal of Virtual Reality, 20(4), 118–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijvr.2021.04.002

Smetana, L. K., & Bell, R. L. (2012). Computer simulations to support science instruction and learning: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 34(9), 1337–1370. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.605182

Tregidgo, D., & Rateliffe, C. (2000). Models in science education. Science Education Review, 2(4), 14–22.

Verdian, S. A., Putra, I. P., & Wijaya, H. (2020). Efektivitas simulasi PhET dalam pembelajaran fisika. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 14(1), 55–62. https://doi.org/10.23917/jpf.v14i1.10098

Wibowo, A., Putri, E., & Nurhadi, D. (2017). The effectiveness of dynamic microscopic models in improving students' understanding of physics concepts. Journal of Physics Education, 43(2), 156–165. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/43/2/009

Wieman, C. E., & Perkins, K. K. (2005). Transforming physics education. Physics Today, 58(11), 36–41.

Zacharia, Z. C. (2007). Comparing and combining real and virtual experimentation: An effort to enhance students' conceptual understanding of electric circuits. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(2), 120–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00215.x