STEM in physics learning: Benefits, challenges, and future research opportunities

Siti Awaliyah Saripah; Firmanul Catur Wibowo; I Made Astra; Esmar Budi

doi:10.21067/mpej.v9i2.11533

Authors

Siti Awaliyah Saripah Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia
Firmanul Catur Wibowo Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia
I Made Astra Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia
Esmar Budi Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21067/mpej.v9i2.11533

Keywords:

Bibliometric, Education, Physics Learning, R-studio, STEM

Abstract

Data-driven approaches have emerged for several reasons, including the continuous evolution of the education sector. Across various educational fields and levels, STEM integration in learning has been implemented. Therefore, this journal presents data on the role of STEM in Physics Education. The research discussion on the use of STEM in Physics learning can also serve as a coherent background and literature review for readers who wish to conduct further research. The literature review is conducted by considering the bibliometric perspective of publications related to STEM integration in Physics learning. This study supports the journal's importance by highlighting the need for reputable journal publications. The analysis aims to provide a comprehensive bibliography and review of STEM's use in Physics learning, utilizing the "Bibliophagy" function within the "bibliometric" package of R-studio. A total of 880 papers, published between 2014 and 2025, were reviewed. This study provides perspectives, namely a general overview, annual publication numbers, prominent authors, institutions with the highest citations per document, and countries with the highest productivity. This analysis generates journals, highly cited authors, reference networks, and groups with significant contributions to the literature. This journal can be used to improve the understanding of readers or future researchers regarding global research, identify research gaps, and support further research in this field.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akgunduz, D. (2016). A research about the placement of the top thousand students in STEM fields in Turkey between 2000 and 2014. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(5), 1365–1377. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1518a

Appio, F. P., Cesaroni, F., & Di Minin, A. (2014). Visualizing the structure and bridges of the intellectual property management and strategy literature: A document co-citation analysis. Scientometrics, 101(1), 623–661. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1398-1

Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007

Castriotta, M., Loi, M., Marku, E., & Naitana, L. (2019). What’s in a name? Exploring the conceptual structure of emerging organizations. Scientometrics, 118(2), 407–437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2989-4

Cisneros, L., Ibanescu, M., Keen, C., Lobato-Calleros, O., & Niebla-Zatarain, J. (2018). Bibliometric study of family business succession between 1939 and 2017: Mapping and analyzing authors’ networks. Scientometrics, 117(2), 919–951. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2891-0

Czerniak, C. M., & Johnson, C. C. (2014). Interdisciplinary science teaching. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. 2, pp. 395–411). Routledge.

Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070

Ellegaard, O., & Wallin, J. A. (2015). The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? Scientometrics, 105(3), 1809–1831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1645-z

Elsevier. (n.d.). Scopus content coverage guide. Elsevier. Retrieved October 14, 2023, from https://www.elsevier.com/solutions/scopus/content

Gautam, P. (2017). An overview of the Web of Science record of scientific publications (2004–2013) from Nepal: Focus on disciplinary diversity and international collaboration. Scientometrics, 113(3), 1245–1267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2530-x

Gehrke, S., & Kezar, A. (2017). The roles of STEM faculty communities of practice in institutional and departmental reform in higher education. American Educational Research Journal, 54(5), 803–833. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831217706736

Kezar, A., Gehrke, S., & Bernstein-Sierra, S. (2017). Designing for success in STEM communities of practice: Philosophy and personal interactions. The Review of Higher Education, 40(2), 217–244. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2017.0007

Kırıcı, M. G., & Bakırcı, H. (2021). The effect of STEM supported research-inquiry-based learning approach on the scientific creativity of 7th grade students. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 5(2), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.33902/jpr.2021267527

Li, C., Wu, K., & Wu, J. (2017). A bibliometric analysis of research on haze during 2000–2016. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24(32), 24733–24742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0177-x

Lupión-Cobos, T., Girón-Gambero, J. R., & García-Ruiz, C. (2022). Building STEM inquiry-based teaching proposal through collaborations between schools and research centres: Students’ and teachers’ perceptions. Frontiers in Education, 7, 891380. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.891380

Mustafa, N., Ismail, Z., Tasir, Z., Said, M., & Haruzuan, M. N. (2016). A meta-analysis on effective strategies for integrated STEM education. Advanced Science Letters, 22(12), 4225–4228. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2016.8111

Palacios-Callender, M., & Roberts, S. A. (2018). Scientific collaboration of Cuban researchers working in Europe: Understanding relations between origin and destination countries. Scientometrics, 117(2), 745–769. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2894-x

Rodríguez-Bolívar, M. P., Alcaide-Muñoz, L., & Cobo, M. J. (2018). Analyzing the scientific evolution and impact of e-Participation research in JCR journals using science mapping. International Journal of Information Management, 40, 111–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.02.003

Ronda-Pupo, G. A. (2017). The effect of document types and sizes on the scaling relationship between citations and co-authorship patterns in management journals. Scientometrics, 110(3), 1191–1207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2226-7

Şahin, A., Ayar, M. C., & Adıgüzel, T. (2014). Fen, teknoloji, mühendislik ve matematik içerikli okul sonrası etkinlikler ve öğrenciler üzerindeki etkileri [STEM after-school activities and their effects on students]. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 14(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2014.1.1876

Sarı, U., Duygu, E., Şen, Ö. F., & Kırındı, T. (2020). The effects of STEM education on scientific process skills and STEM awareness in simulation-based inquiry learning environment. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17(3), 387–405. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2020.30

Tahamtan, I., Safipour Afshar, A., & Ahamdzadeh, K. (2016). Factors affecting number of citations: A comprehensive review of the literature. Scientometrics, 107(3), 1195–1225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1889-2

Thelwall, M., & Sud, P. (2022). Scopus 1900–2020: Growth in articles, abstracts, countries, fields, and journals. Quantitative Science Studies, 3(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00165

Wang, J. (2013). Citation time window choice for research impact evaluation. Scientometrics, 94(3), 851–872. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0775-9

Yıldırım, B., & Altun, Y. (2015). STEM eğitim ve mühendislik uygulamalarının fen bilgisi laboratuar dersindeki etkilerinin incelenmesi [Investigating the effect of STEM education and engineering applications on science laboratory lectures]. El-Cezeri Journal of Science and Engineering, 2(2), 28–40. https://doi.org/10.31202/ecjse.256887