The role of ALIVP model in developing pesantren students’ argumentation abilities on temperature and heat concepts

Agus Budiyono; Arin Wildani; Akhmad Jufriadi; Luh Sukariasih

doi:10.21067/mpej.v9i2.11699

Authors

Agus Budiyono Universitas Islam Madura, Indonesia
Arin Wildani Universitas Islam Madura, Indonesia
Akhmad Jufriadi Universitas PGRI Kanjuruhan Malang, Indonesia
Luh Sukariasih Universitas Halu Oleo, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21067/mpej.v9i2.11699

Keywords:

ALIVP Model, argumentation abilities, temperature and heat, pesantren student

Abstract

Argumentation abilities are critical for students to develop in physics learning, yet most studies focus on students outside pesantren. This research investigates the argumentation abilities of pesantren students on the topics of temperature and heat. The study employs a pre-experimental design with a one-group pretest-posttest approach. The instrument used is a test comprising six essay questions assessing argumentation abilities. The data in this study were examined using a paired sample t-test, effect size calculation, and N-gain analysis to assess changes in students' argumentation abilities. The findings demonstrated a significant enhancement in students' argumentation abilities following the implementation of the ALIVP learning model. The effect size analysis indicated a very large impact, while the N-gain results classified the improvement as high. A detailed examination of argumentation indicators revealed that the highest increase occurred in claim accuracy, followed by the completeness and credibility of data, strength of backing, and strength of evidence. These findings suggest that the ALIVP model successfully enhances the argumentation abilities of pesantren students in physics learning, bridging a gap in current research. This study underscores the potential of integrating argumentation-focused learning models in pesantren to foster critical thinking in scientific contexts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adib, M. (2022). Bahtsul Masail Multidisipliner: Pembaruan Metodologis Ijtihad Kolektif NU. MAQASHID Jurnal Hukum Islam, 5(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.35897/maqashid.v5i1.782

Admoko, S., Arizah, K. L., Suprapto, N., & Deta, U. A. (2023). Research on Bibliometric Analysis of Toulmin’s Argument Pattern (TAP) in Learning Physics in the Last Ten Years | International Journal of Current Educational Research. International Journal of Current Educational Research, 2(1), 66–79.

Admoko, S., Artanti, K. P. A. I., Hariyono, E., & Madlazim, M. (2022). Implementation of the Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) Model in Physics Learning of 2012-2021: Bibliometric Analysis. International Journal of Current Educational Research, 1(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.53621/ijocer.v1i2.183

Admoko, S., Hanifah, N., Suprapto, N., Hariyono, E., & Madlazim, M. (2021). The implementation of Argument Driven Inquiry (ADI) learning model to improve scientific argumentation skills of high school students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1747(1), 012046. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1747/1/012046

Amiruddin, M. Z. B., Sari, E. P. D. N., Paramita, U. V., Suliyanah, S., & Admoko, S. (2023). The Contribution Of Toulmin’s Argumentation Patterns In Physics Learning In Indonesia: Literature Review. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan IPA, 14(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.26418/jpmipa.v14i1.55338

Antonio, R. P., & Prudente, M. S. (2021). Metacognitive Argument-Driven Inquiry in Teaching Antimicrobial Resistance: Effects on Students’ Conceptual Understanding and Argumentation Skills. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18(2), 192–217. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2021.60

Bestiantono, D. S. (2020). Students’ Responses toward Scientific Argumentation with ADI Learning Model to Physics Literacy: A Case of Indonesian Senior High School Students. Studies in Learning and Teaching, 1(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.46627/silet.v1i1.18

Budiyono, A., Yuliati, L., Diantoro, M., & Taufiq, A. (2023). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Fisika Di Pesantren Melalui Model Argument Learning And Islamic Values On Pesantren (ALIVP). EDUSAINS, 15(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v15i2.37984

Cohen, J. (2009). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2. ed., reprint). Psychology Press.

Cope, B., Kalantzis, M., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Bagley, E. (2013). Science in Writing: Learning Scientific Argument in Principle and Practice. E-Learning and Digital Media, 10(4), 420–441. https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2013.10.4.420

Dwikoranto. (2023). Using Toulmin’s Argument Pattern on Problem Solving Model to Improve Problem-Solving Analysis Ability: Learning Alternatives During the Covid-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 3(2), 200–209.

Egista, E., Haryanto, H., & Mustofa, H. A. (2025). The Effectiveness of Augmented Reality as a Learning Medium in Enhancing Students’ Motivation and Their Ability to Analyze Physics Concepts. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 13(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v13i1.42239

Eldy, E. F., Sulaiman, F., Ishak, M. Z., Uden, L., & Netto-Shek, J.-A. (2023). The Effectiveness of Integrated Online Problem-Based Learning (iON-PBL) Physics Module on Pre-university Students’ Motivation and Problem-Solving Skills. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 1830 CCIS, 164–175. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34754-2_14

Erduran, S., & Park, W. (2023). Argumentation in Physics Education Research: Recent Trends and Key Themes. In Instructional Strategies that Foster Effective Problem-Solving (1st ed., p. (16-1)-(16-28)). AIP Publishing. https://pubs.aip.org/books/monograph/148/chapter/64395790/Argumentation-in-Physics-Education-Research-Recent

Fakhruddin, Ayana, Y., & Zulfarina. (2023). The Effectiveness of the PhET Assistant Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) Learning Model on Student’s Argumentation Ability on Substance Pressure Materials. KnE Social Sciences, 299–311. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v8i8.13305

Fitriah, L. (2020). Use of islamic and local wisdom textbook to train the religious character of prospective physics teachers. Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, Query date: 2024-01-24 10:10:46. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/f361/0149822ab24acda8ea4eac848b3923e68977.pdf

Fuadah, M. I., Mubarok, H., & Suliyanah, S. (2023). The Effect of Argument Driven Inquiry (ADI) Model on the Scientific Argumentation Ability of High School Students on the Topic of Light Waves. International Journal of Research and Community Empowerment, 1(2), 53–61. https://doi.org/10.58706/ijorce.v1n2.p53-61

García-Pérez, J. A., Cebrián-Robles, D., & Blanco-López, Á. (2024). Critical Analysis of Information on Pasteurisation by High School Biology Students. Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education, 2, 109–119. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-78578-8_6

Governor, D., Lombardi, D., & Duffield, C. (2021). Negotiations in scientific argumentation: An interpersonal analysis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(9), 1389–1424. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21713

Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809

Hasyimi, M. L. A. (2023). Problem Based Learning (PBL) Bahtsul Masa’il as a Contextual Fiqh Learning Method. Jurnal Paradigma, 15(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.53961/paradigma.v15i01.1

Jang, K. H., & Nam, J. (2016). The effect of negotiation in argument-based inquiry on middle school students’ claim and evidence. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 60(1), 39–47. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2016.60.1.39

Jewaru, A. A. L., Parno, P., Nasikhudin, N., Kusairi, S., & Latifah, E. (2023). Exploration of students’ scientific argumentation ability on thermodynamics through authentic PBL with STEM approach and formative assessment. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2569(1), 050011. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0112509

Jin, Q., & Kim, M. (2021). Supporting elementary students’ scientific argumentation with argument-focused metacognitive scaffolds (AMS). International Journal of Science Education, 43(12), 1984–2006. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1947542

Jo, H., & Choi, A. (2015). The effects of the argument-based claim and evidence writing approach: Focus on high school chemistry. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 59(1), 69–77. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2015.59.1.69

Jumadi, J., Perdana, R., Riwayani, & Rosana, D. (2021). The Impact of Problem-Based Learning with Argument Mapping and Online Laboratory on Scientific Argumentation Skill. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(1), 16–23.

Junior, N. B., Costa, I., & Martins, T. D. (2024). The importance of experimentation in physics teaching in the education of young people and adults: A importância da experimentação no ensino de física na educação de jovens e adultos. Concilium, 24(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.53660/CLM-2784-24B37

Keys, C. W., Hand, B., Prain, V., & Collins, S. (1999). Using the Science Writing Heuristic as a Tool for Learning from Laboratory Investigations in Secondary Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(10), 1065–1084. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199912)36:10<1065::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-I

Maria Chona Z. Futalan, Brando A. Piñero, & Manilyn R. Rosales. (2025). Interactive Physics Toys in Teaching Basic Concepts of Linear Motion. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 3(3), 1–1.

Murdani, E., Suhandi, A., Muslim, M., Setiawan, A., Samsudin, A., & Costu, B. (2023). Physics Argumentation-Based Computer-Supported Collaborative Hybrid Learning To Increase Concept Mastery And Argumentation Skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 12(2), 232–240. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v12i2.42457

Muslim, -. (2014). Pengembangan Program Perkuliahan Fisika Sekolah Berorientasi Kemampuan Berargumentasi Calon Guru Fisika [Phd, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia]. https://doi.org/10/D_IPA_0808728_Appendix.pdf

Muslim, & Suhandi, A. (2012). Development of School Physics Learning Tools to Improve Conceptual Understanding and Argumentation Skills of Prospective Physics Teachers. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 8(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi.v8i2.2157

Muslim, M., Sihombing, R. A., Zakwandi, R., & Karimi, A. (2024). Evaluating Students’ Argumentation Skills Using an Argument-Generating Learning Model Supported Toulmin’s Argumentation Pattern in Physics Concepts. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 13(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.15294/cqbk6b58

Nicholus, G., Muwonge, C. M., & Joseph, N. (2023). The Role of Problem-Based Learning Approach in Teaching and Learning Physics: A Systematic Literature Review. F1000Research, 12. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.136339.2

Odden, T. O. B., & Burk, J. (2020). Computational Essays in the Physics Classroom. The Physics Teacher, 58(4), 252–255. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.5145471

Parra Zeltzer, V., Huincahue Arcos, J., & Abril Milan, D. (2024). How do you argue in physics class? A systematic review from 2018-2023. 2024-September, 263–268. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.54808/WMSCI2024.01.263

Ping, I. L. L., Halim, L., & Osman, K. (2020). Explicit teaching of scientific argumentation as an approach in developing argumentation skills, science process skills and biology understanding. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(2), 276–288. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/20.19.276

Pols, C. F. J., Dekkers, P. J. J. M., & de Vries, M. J. (2023). Integrating argumentation in physics inquiry: A design and evaluation study. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 19(2), 020170. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.020170

Prifes, R., & Okmarisa, H. (2024). The Effect of Problem Based Learning (PBL) Learning Model on Students’ Argumentation Ability on Salt Hydrolysis Material. Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia, 12(1), 127–134. https://doi.org/10.33394/hjkk.v12i1.10679

Purwati, N., Handayani, B. S., & Fadli, A. (2023). Metacognitional skills of Madrasah Tsanawiyah students in West Lombok in integrated science learning with Islamic value. 2619. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0123944

Purwati, N., Zubaidah, S., Corebima, A. D., & Mahanal, S. (2018). Increasing Islamic Junior High School Students Learning Outcomes through Integration of Science Learning and Islamic Values. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 841–854.

Rachmawati, O. Q., Parno, Latifah, E., Wisodo, H., Ghorbiy, B., & Bunyamin, M. A. H. (2024). Students’ scientific argumentation skills through PjBL–STEAM model assisted by web-based interactive PowerPoint on static fluid. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2900(1), 012015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2900/1/012015

Skitalinskaya, G., Klaff, J., & Wachsmuth, H. (2021). Learning From Revisions: Quality Assessment of Claims in Argumentation at Scale. In P. Merlo, J. Tiedemann, & R. Tsarfaty (Eds.), Proceedings of the 16th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Main Volume (pp. 1718–1729). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.eacl-main.147

Sollereder, B. N. (2019). Beyond Barbour: New Ways of Teaching the Relationship Between Science and Religion. In B. Billingsley, K. Chappell, & M. J. Reiss (Eds.), Science and Religion in Education (pp. 15–18). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17234-3_2

Suganda, T., Parno, Sunaryono, Yuliati, L., & Latifah, E. (2023). Building students’ scientific argumentation skills through the model ADI integrated STEM approach and formative assessment. 2614. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0125798

Suliyanah, Fadillah, R. N., & Deta, U. A. (2020). The Process of Developing Students’ Scientific Argumentation Skill Using Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) Model in Senior High School on The Topic of Elasticity. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1491(1), 012046. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1491/1/012046

Tristanti, L. B., & Nusantara, T. (2021). Improving Students’ Mathematical Argumentation Skill through Infusion Learning Strategy. 1783(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1783/1/012103

Voitkiv, H., & Lishchynskyy, I. (2022). Practical Works In Primary School Physics Course. Scientific Journal of Polonia University, 55(6), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.23856/5514

Walker, J. P., Van Duzor, A. G., & Lower, M. A. (2019). Facilitating Argumentation in the Laboratory: The Challenges of Claim Change and Justification by Theory. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(3), 435–444. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00745

Wulan, E. R., Gunawan, H., Fauziah, W., & Kratz, F. (2021). Integration of Science, Technology, and Islamic Values to Enhance Expected Learning Outcomes in French Higher Education. Journal of Islamic Education, 7(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.15575/jpi.v7i1.12765

Xiao, S., & Kuhn, D. (2024). Inquiry and argumentation skill development work in conjunction. Cognitive Development, 71. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2024.101464

Yang, F.-J., Su, C.-Y., Xu, W.-W., & Hu, Y. (2023). Effects of developing prompt scaffolding to support collaborative scientific argumentation in simulation-based physics learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(10), 6526–6541. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2041673

Zhang, J., & Browne, W. J. (2023). Exploring Chinese high school students’ performance and perceptions of scientific argumentation by understanding it as a three-component progression of competencies. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 60(4), 847–884. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21819

Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O., Beck, K., Fischer, J., Braunheim, D., Schmidt, S., & Shavelson, R. J. (2020). The Role of Students’ Beliefs When Critically Reasoning From Multiple Contradictory Sources of Information in Performance Assessments. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02192