The influence of active involvement on learning outcomes of physics pre-service teachers: A case study of blended learning on statistics course

Andista Candra Yusro; Mislan Sasono; Gilang Primayoga

doi:10.21067/mpej.v4i1.4194

Authors

Andista Candra Yusro Universitas PGRI Madiun, Indonesia
Mislan Sasono Universitas PGRI Madiun, Indonesia
Gilang Primayoga Universitas PGRI Madiun, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21067/mpej.v4i1.4194

Keywords:

blended learning, physics pre-service teacher, statistics course

Abstract

This research aimed at identifying the influence of active involvement on blended learning for Statistics course on the learning outcomes of Physics pre-service teacher. This research also attempted to depict the benefits and challenges during the implementation of blended learning in the higher education context, particularly the implementation of blended learning for Statistics course among Physics pre-service teachers. The sample of this research was the entire students of Physics education department who attended Statistics course in the Fifth semester. Based on the results of the research, the active involvement of Physics pre-service teachers during blended learning session on Statistics course contributes as much as 56.5%. While the correlation equation obtained was Y= 44.509 + 0.503 X. The average responses of blended learning given by the Physics pre-service teacher on Statistics course was 81.5%. The implementation of blended learning for Statistics course improves the active involvement of Physics pre-service teachers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Andista Candra Yusro, Universitas PGRI Madiun, Indonesia

Prodi Pendidikan Fisika

References

Afifah, S. N., & Wicaksana, E. J. (2017). Persepsi mahasiswa tentang mata kuliah statistik serta pengaruhnya terhadap prestasi belajar statistik mahasiswa IKIP PGRI Madiun. Jurnal CARE (Children Advisory Research and Education), 2(1).

Alammary, A., Sheard, J., & Carbone, A. (2014). Blended learning in higher education: Three different design approaches. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(4).

Ali, M. (2007). Analisis dampak implementasi model blended learning: Kombinasi pembelajaran di kelas dan e-learning pada mata kuliah medan elektromagnetik. Laporan Penelitian. UNY.

Divayana, D. G. H. (2017). Evaluasi pelaksanaan blended learning di SMK TI Udayana menggunakan model CSE-UCLA. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 7(1), 64-77.

Draper, N. R., & Smith, H. (1998). Applied regression analysis (Vol. 326): John Wiley & Sons.

Effendi, M. (2016). Integrasi pembelajaran active learning dan internet-based learning dalam meningkatkan keaktifan dan kreativitas belajar. Nadwa, 7(2), 283-309.

Field, A. (2009). Discopering Statistics using SPSS, Thrid Edition. In: Sage Publications.

Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines: John Wiley & Sons.

Hudha, M. N., Chaeruman, U. A., Aji, S. D., Huda, C., Yusro, A. C., Kumala, F. N., . . . Abdullah, A. G. (2018). SPADA: Online learning between universities of PGRI Indonesia. Paper presented at the MATEC Web of Conferences.

Jeffrey, L. M., Milne, J., Suddaby, G., & Higgins, A. (2014). Blended learning: How teachers balance the blend of online and classroom components. Journal of Information Technology Education, 13.

Kim, K. J., Bonk, C. J., & Oh, E. (2008). The present and future state of blended learning in workplace learning settings in the United States. Performance Improvement, 47(8), 5-16.

Kirna, I. M. (2014). Pengembangan konten online untuk mendukung blended learning pada perkuliahan kimia kuantum dasar. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 33(2).

Kusni, M. (2010). Implementasi sistem pembelajaran blended learning pada kuliah AE3121 getaran mekanik di Program Studi Aeronotika dan Astronotika. Paper presented at the ITB, disajikan dalam Seminar Nasional Tahunan Teknik Mesin (SNTTM) ke-9 Palembang.

Liu, R., Kuang, J., Gong, Q., & Hou, X. (2003). Principal component regression analysis with SPSS. Computer methods and programs in biomedicine, 71(2), 141-147.

LÃƒÂ³pez-PÃƒÂ©rez, M. V., PÃƒÂ©rez-LÃƒÂ³pez, M. C., & RodrÃƒÂguez-Ariza, L. (2011). Blended learning in higher education: StudentsÃ¢â‚¬â„¢ perceptions and their relation to outcomes. Computers & Education, 56(3), 818-826.

McCray, G. E. (2000). The hybrid course: Merging on-line instruction and the traditional classroom. Information Technology and Management, 1(4), 307-327.

Mendez, J. A., & Gonzalez, E. J. (2011). Implementing motivational features in reactive blended learning: Application to an introductory control engineering course. IEEE Transactions on Education, 54(4), 619-627.

Mubarok, A. (2015). Peningkatan keaktifan belajar melalui penerapan metode blended learning dengan pendekatan pembelajaran tatap muka di kelas dan social network facebook pada kompetensi sistem transmisi siswa SMK Pancasila Surakarta. Jurnal Nosel, 3(4).

Muis, A., & Bahri, A. (2018). Respon guru dan siswa SMA terhadap penggunaan Quipper School dalam blended learning pada pembelajaran biologi. Biology Teaching and Learning, 1(2), 167-171.

Murni, D., & Hodijah, S. R. N. (2016). Pengaruh blended learning berbasis scaffolding terhadap hasil belajar mahasiswa pada konsep substansi genetika.

Okaz, A. A. (2015). Integrating blended learning in higher education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 186, 600-603.

Porter, W. W., & Graham, C. R. (2016). Institutional drivers and barriers to faculty adoption of blended learning in higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(4), 748-762.

Porter, W. W., Graham, C. R., Spring, K. A., & Welch, K. R. (2014). Blended learning in higher education: Institutional adoption and implementation. Computers & Education, 75, 185-195.

Purwitasari, D., Astawa, I., & Sudiarta, I. (2019). Penerapan blended learning berbantuan schoology untuk meningkatkan keaktifan dan prestasi belajar matematika siswa kelas VIII A1 SMP Negeri 6 Singaraja. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Matematika Indonesia, 8(2), 143-152.

Santoso, A. B., Yusro, A. C., Malawi, I., Hanif, M., & Kokotiasa, W. (2019). Evaluation of the application of information technology and communication in lectures in the Primary School Teacher Education Study Program. Paper presented at the Journal of Physics: Conference Series.

Seber, G. A., & Lee, A. J. (2012). Linear regression analysis (Vol. 329): John Wiley & Sons.

Sofiana, N. (2015). Implementasi blended learning pada mata kuliah extensive listening. Tarbawi: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 12(1).

Subekti, F. E., Untarti, R., & Muhammad, M. (2016). Deskripsi kemampuan komunikasi matematis mahasiswa pada mata kuliah statistik pendidikan. Euclid, 2(2).

Vaughan, N. (2007). Perspectives on blended learning in higher education. International Journal on E-learning, 6(1), 81-94.

Widiyanto, T. (2015). Peningkatan keaktifan dan hasil belajar kompetensi dasar pembentukan logam dengan blended learning berbantuan media sosial schoology di kelas X TKRD SMK Negeri 2 Surakarta. Jurnal Nosel, 4(1).

Wijaya, I., Suweken, G., & Mertasari, N. (2017). Pengaruh penerapan model pembelajaran blended learning terhadap motivasi berprestasi dan prestasi belajar matematika siswa SMA Negeri 1 Singaraja. Wahana Matematika dan Sains: Jurnal Matematika, Sains, dan Pembelajarannya, 10(2), 36-47.

Yusro, A. C. (2018). Kemampuan Calon guru fisika dalam penguasan TIK dan media pembelajaran berbasis ICT di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Paper presented at the SNPF 2018: Peran Pendidik dan Ilmuan Sains dalam Meyongsong Revolusi Industri 4.0.