Scientific creativity: A bibliometric review and analysis

Authors

  • Surya Haryandi Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, Indonesia
  • Suyidno Suyidno Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, Indonesia
  • Misbah Misbah Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, Indonesia
  • Dewi Dewantara Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, Indonesia
  • Saiyidah Mahtari Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, Indonesia
  • Mohd Ali Ibrahim Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21067/mpej.v5i1.5002

Keywords:

bibliometric analysis, creative thinking, scientific creativity

Abstract

Scientific creativity is one of the higher-order thinking skills which are highly functional for each individual. Scientific creativity encourages the individual to not only generate creative ideas, but also promotes the notion of the appropriate technology. This article provides an in-depth explanation of the bibliometric analysis of scientific literature in education. The articles search was performed by utilizing Publish or Perish (PoP) software on the Crossref database. The search and sort results discovered that 28 of 200 articles were found between the years of 2019-2020. The selected metadata was edited using Mendeley Desktop software. The edited results were then analyzed further and visualized using the VOSviewer software. Overall, articles with the keyword scientific creativity published in the 2019-2020 period have not been cited, and it is essential to be studied collaboratively not only between national institutions but also internationally.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akcanca, N., & Ozsevgec, L. C. (2018). Effect of Activities Prepared by Different Teaching Techniques on Scientific Creativity Levels of Prospective Pre-school Teachers. European Journal of Educational Research, 7(1), 71–86. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.7.1.71.

Astutik, S., & Prahani, B. K. (2018). The Practicality and Effectiveness of Collaborative Creativity Learning (CCL) Model by Using PhET Simulation to Increase Students’ Scientific Creativity. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 409–424. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11426a.

Baneyx, A. (2008). “Publish or Perish†as citation metrics used to analyze scientific output in the humanities : International case studies in economics, geography, social sciences, philosophy, and history. Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis, 56(6), 363–371. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s00005-008-0043-0.

Garza-Reyes, J. A. (2015). Lean and green-a systematic Review of the state of the art literature. Journal of Cleaner Production, 102, 18–29. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.064.

Hamidah, I., Sriyono, & Hudha, M. N. (2020). A Bibliometric Analysis of Covid-19 Research using vosviewer. Indonesian Journal of Science and Technology, 5(2), 209–216.

Hernández-Torrano, D., & Ibrayeva, L. (2020). Creativity and education: A bibliometric mapping of the research literature (1975–2019). Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35(September 2019), 100625. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100625.

Hudha, M. N., Hamidah, I., Permanasari, A., Abdullah, A. G., Rachman, I., & Matsumoto, T. (2020). Low carbon education: A review and bibliometric analysis. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(1), 319–329. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.1.319.

Komarudin, D. (2018). Hubungan Antara Kreativitas Dengan Prestasi Belajar Siswa. Psympathic : Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi, 4(1), 278–288. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.15575/psy.v4i1.2196.

Lau, J. Y. F. (2011). An Introduction to Critical Thinking and Creativity: Think More, Think Better. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.

Liu, Z., Yin, Y., Liu, W., & Dunford, M. (2015). Visualizing the intellectual structure and evolution of innovation systems research : A bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 103(1), 135–158. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1517-y.

Ozdemir, G., & Dikici, A. (2016). Relationships between Scientific Process Skills and Scientific Creativity: Mediating Role of Nature of Science Knowledge. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health, 3(1), 52–52. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.21891/jeseh.275696.

Patmalasari, D., Nur Afifah, D. S., & Resbiantoro, G. (2017). Karakteristik Tingkat Kreativitas Siswa yang Memiliki Disposisi Matematis Tinggi dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika. JIPM (Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika), 6(1), 30. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.25273/jipm.v6i1.1509.

Ramadhani, I., & Sirait, M. (2015). Efek Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek Dengan Strategi Think Talk Write Dan Kreativitas Ilmiah Terhadap Hasil Belajar Kognitif Tingkat Tinggi Siswa Sma Pada Pelajaran Fisika. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 4(1), 17. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.22611/jpf.v4i1.2564.

Rodrigues, M., & Franco, M. (2020). Networks and performance of creative cities: A bibliometric analysis. City, Culture and Society, 20(October 2019), 100326. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.2019.100326.

Rosa, M. S. C., Almeida, M. R. de, & González, M. O. A. (2019). Business games and creativity: A bibliometric study and research themes. Product Management & Development, 17(1), 31–43.

Samsudin, A., Setyadin, A. H., Suhendi, E., Chandra, D. T., & Siahaan, P. (2018). Seventh grade students’ scientific creativity test: A preliminary-study on earth science context. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 288(1). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/288/1/012012.

Setyaningsih, I., Indarti, N., & Jie, F. (2018). Bibliometric Analysis of The Term “Green Manufacturing.†International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy, 11(3), 315. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1504/ijmcp.2018.093500.

Suyidno, S., Nur, M., & Yuanita, L. (2016). Developing Worksheets Based on Scientific Creativity in Fundamental Physics Course. The 2nd International on Science Education (ISSE), 442–449. Retrieved from http://eprints.ulm.ac.id/4297/.

Suyidno, S., Susilowati, E., Arifuddin, M., Misbah, M., Sunarti, T., & Dwikoranto, D. (2019). Increasing Students’ Responsibility and Scientific Creativity through Creative Responsibility Based Learning. Jurnal Penelitian Fisika Dan Aplikasinya (JPFA), 9(2), 178. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.26740/jpfa.v9n2.p147-157.

Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3.

Wahyudi, Verawati, N. N. S. P., Ayub, S., & Prayogi, S. (2019). The Effect of Scientific Creativity in Inquiry Learning to Promote Critical Thinking Ability of Prospective Teachers. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14(14), 122–131. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i14.9532.

Yang, K. K., Hong, Z. R., Lee, L., & Lin, H. S. (2019). Exploring the Significant Predictors of Convergent and Divergent Scientific Creativities. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31(January), 252–261. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.01.002.

Zainudin, M., & Irhadtanto, B. (2016). Efektivitas Pembelajaran Laboratorium Berbasis Proyek (PLBP) terhadap Kreativitas Mahasiswa. JIPM (Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika), 5(1), 33. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.25273/jipm.v5i1.853.

Downloads

Published

2021-01-31

How to Cite

Haryandi, S., Suyidno, S., Misbah, M., Dewantara, D., Mahtari, S., & Ibrahim, M. A. (2021). Scientific creativity: A bibliometric review and analysis. Momentum: Physics Education Journal, 5(1), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.21067/mpej.v5i1.5002

Issue

Section

Articles