Kolb's learning style analysis in solving HOTS questions for prospective physics teacher students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21067/mpej.v6i1.5593Keywords:
Kolb's learning style, HOTS, Archimedes' principleAbstract
This study aims to analyze Kolb's Learning Style (KLS) in solving HOTS questions for prospective physics teacher students. This research is a descriptive study using a qualitative approach. The subjects of this research are second semester students who have joined the Basic Physics course for Archimedes' Principle, amounting to 46 people. The instrument used was a Kolb's Learning Style (KLS) questionnaire, which consisted of 40 statement items, 8 essay questions about HOTS, and interview guidelines. Based on the results of the study, it showed that from the maximum percentage (100%) in each Kolb's Learning Style (KLS) obtained the combination of diverger and assimilator learning styles as the highest average percentage (65.63%) in solving HOTS questions correctly compared to the other learning styles. It is followed by the accomodator (56.25%), the combination of assimilator and converger (54.17%), diverger (53.41%), assimilator (49.22%), and converger (48.61%). There are differences in Kolb's Learning Style (KLS) in solving HOTS questions for prospective physics teacher students where students still experience errors in answering questions. The forms of incorrect answers given by students include: 1) Objects with a smaller surface area must be sink, 2) Heavy objects must be sink, 3) The amount of water affects the state of floating and sinking, 4) Hollow objects always float, and 5) Objects made of something hard must be sink. Based on the results of this study, it can be concluded that the ability of prospective physics teacher students in solving HOTS questions must be trained by adjusting their learning styles.
Downloads
References
Abosalem, Y. M. (2013). The relationship between the learning styles of students in grades five and six and their held misconceptions about dividing fractions based on Kolb’s model. The British University in Dubai (BUiD). https://bspace.buid.ac.ae/handle/1234/511
Ain, N. (2021). Prospective physics teacher’s ability in developing HOTS questions: CRI analysis. Momentum: Physics Education Journal, 5(1), 85–93. https://doi.org/10.21067/mpej.v5i2.5566
Ajideh, P., Zohrabi, M., & Pouralvar, K. (2018). Investigating the relationship between learning styles and ESP reading strategies in academic setting. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 7(3), 156. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.7n.3p.156
Arafah, K., Amin, B. D., Sari, S. S., & Hakim, A. (2021). The development of higher order-thinking skills (HOTS) instrument assessment in physics study. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1899(1), 012140. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1899/1/012140
Binali, T., Tsai, C.-C., & Chang, H.-Y. (2021). University students’ profiles of online learning and their relation to online metacognitive regulation and internet-specific epistemic justification. Computers & Education, 175, 104315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104315
Dermawan, D. A., Siagian, P., & Sinaga, B. (2021). Analysis of students’ mathematical problem solving ability in terms of student learning styles with models problem based learning. Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal, 4(1), 337–344. https://doi.org/10.33258/birle.v4i1.1607
Falloon, G. (2019). Using simulations to teach young students science concepts: An Experiential Learning theoretical analysis. Computers & Education, 135, 138–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.03.001
Gamboa Mora, M. C., Vera-Monroy, S. P., MejÃÂa-Camacho, A., & Guerrero Rueda, W. J. (2021). Perception channels and cognitive styles: opponents, followers or learning allies? Heliyon, 7(2), e06242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06242
Hajaro, U., Nayazik, A., & Kusumawati, R. (2021). Analysis of david kolb’s learning style according to mathematical representation ability. Journal of Medives : Journal of Mathematics Education IKIP Veteran Semarang, 5(2), 403. https://doi.org/10.31331/medivesveteran.v5i2.1709
Istiningtiyas, D. (2021). The influence of learning style on achievement through motivation as a moderator variable. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Proficiency, 3(2), 20. https://doi.org/10.32503/proficiency.v3i2.1917
Jalinus, N., Ganefri, G., Syahril, S., Wulansari, R. E., Nabawi, R. A., Yunos, J. M., & Kiong, T. T. (2020). Comparison of learning style between engineering and non-engineering students in vocational education. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 13(12), 283–294. https://www.ijicc.net/images/vol_13/Iss_12/131226_Jalinus_2020_E_R.pdf
Jarvis, M. A., & Baloyi, O. B. (2020). Scaffolding in reflective journaling: A means to develop higher order thinking skills in undergraduate learners. International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences, 12, 100195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijans.2020.100195
Kholid, M. N., Hamida, P. S., Pradana, L. N., & Maharani, S. (2020). Students‘ critical thinking depends on their cognitive style. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 9(1), 1045–1049.
Kwangmuang, P., Jarutkamolpong, S., Sangboonraung, W., & Daungtod, S. (2021). The development of learning innovation to enhance higher order thinking skills for students in Thailand junior high schools. Heliyon, 7(6), e07309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07309
Lwande, C., Muchemi, L., & Oboko, R. (2021). Identifying learning styles and cognitive traits in a learning management system. Heliyon, 7(8), e07701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07701
McKenna, L., Copnell, B., Butler, A. E., & Lau, R. (2018). Learning style preferences of Australian accelerated postgraduate pre-registration nursing students: A cross-sectional survey. Nurse Education in Practice, 28(October), 280–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2017.10.011
Pantas, A. A., & Hasruddin, H. (2020). The influence of student learning style on higher order thinking skill (HOTS) of cell structure and function topic. Jurnal Pelita Pendidikan, 8(1), 71–79. https://doi.org/10.24114/jpp.v8i1.11251
Patricia Aguilera-Hermida, A. (2020). College students’ use and acceptance of emergency online learning due to COVID-19. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 1, 100011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100011
Retnawati, H., Djidu, H., Kartianom, A., & Anazifa, R. D. (2018). Teachers’ knowledge about higher-order thinking skills and its learning strategy. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 76(2), 215. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=942236
Sen, S., & Yilmaz, A. (2012). The effect of learning styles on student’s misconceptions and selfefficacy for learning and performance. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 1482–1486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.325
Tyas, M. A., Nurkamto, J., Marmanto, S., & Laksani, H. (2019). Developing higher order thinking skills (HOTS) – Based questions: Indonesian EFL teachers’ challenges. Proceeding of the 2nd International Conference on Future of Education, 2(1), 52–63. https://doi.org/10.17501/26307413.2019.2106
Vasil’ev, E. N., & Gorelikov, A. I. (1998). Radiation pattern of the horn with the corrugated flange. Huagong Kuangshan Jishu/Technology for Chemical Mines, 27(4), 46–50.
Viloria, A., Gonzalez, I. R. P., & Lezama, O. B. P. (2019). Learning style preferences of college students using big data. Procedia Computer Science, 160, 461–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.11.064
Yuniarti, A. P., Pramudya, I., & Slamet, I. (2021). Analysis of mathematical creative thinking skill in student with kinesthetic learning style. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 8(4), 128. https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v8i4.2451
Zhong, B., & Wang, Y. (2021). Effects of roles assignment and learning styles on pair learning in robotics education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 31(1), 41–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-019-09536-2
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Momentum: Physics Education Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Momentum: Physisc Education Journal allows readers to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of its articles and allow readers to use them for any other lawful purpose. 
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The Authors submitting a manuscript do so with the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to Momentum: Physics Education Journal
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
