Measuring thermal conductivity via basic home equipment

Authors

  • Mustafa Erol Dokuz Eylül University, Turkey
  • Muhammed Emre Kuzucu Dokuz Eylül University, Turkey

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21067/mpej.v6i1.6306

Keywords:

physics education, thermal conductivity, home equipment, mathematical modelling

Abstract

This work reports a trouble-free alternative measuring approach for instructing the puzzling concept of thermal conductivity. In order to accomplish the task, a basic daily used home equipment is employed together with a mathematical modelling approach. Specifically, a simple approach to measure the thermal conductivity coefficient is described and temperature dependence of the thermal conductivity is mathematically modelled. Developed method is interesting in the sense that the experimental equipment is very practical and minimal costing, hence the approach offers physics educators fresh teaching routes and opportunities to clarify the puzzling concept of thermal conductivity and related concepts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alvarado, S., Marín, E., Juárez, A. G., Calderón, A., & Ivanov, R. (2012). A hot-wire method based thermal conductivity measurement apparatus for teaching purposes. European Journal of Physics, 33(4), 897–906. https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/33/4/897

Alwan, A. A. (2011). Misconception of heat and temperature Among physics students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 12, 600–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.02.074

Brewe, E. (2008). Modeling theory applied: Modeling Instruction in introductory physics. American Journal of Physics, 76(12), 1155–1160. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2983148

Cotignola, M. I., Bordogna, C., Punte, G., & Cappannini, O. M. (2002). Difficulties in learning thermodynamic concepts are they linked to the historical development of this field? Science & Education, 11(3), 279–291. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015205123254

Fenditasari, K., Jumadi, Istiyono, E., & Hendra. (2020). Identification of misconceptions on heat and temperature among physics education students using four-tier diagnostic test. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1470(1), 012055. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1470/1/012055

Gilbert, J. K. (2004). Models and modelling: Routes to more authentic science education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(2), 115–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-004-3186-4

Gilbert, J. K., Boulter, C. J., & Elmer, R. (2000). Positioning models in science education and in design and technology education. In Developing Models in Science Education (pp. 3–17). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0876-1_1

Greca, I. M., & Moreira, M. A. (2002). Mental, physical, and mathematical models in the teaching and learning of physics. Science Education, 86(1), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10013

Grosslight, L., Unger, C., Jay, E., & Smith, C. L. (1991). Understanding models and their use in science: Conceptions of middle and high school students and experts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(9), 799–822. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660280907

Hestenes, D. (1987). Toward a modeling theory of physics instruction. American Journal of Physics, 55(5), 440–454. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.15129

Hestenes, D. (1997). Modeling methodology for physics teachers. AIP Conference Proceedings, 399, 935–958. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.53196

Jasien, P. G., & Oberem, G. E. (2002). Understanding of elementary concepts in heat and temperature among college students and K-12 teachers. Journal of Chemical Education, 79(7), 889. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed079p889

Kemp, H. R. (1984). The concept of energy without heat or work. Physics Education, 19(5), 003. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/19/5/003

Kulkarni, V. D., & Tambade, P. S. (2017). Assessing the conceptual understanding about heat and thermodynamics at undergraduate level. European Journal Of Physics Education, 4(2), 9–16. http://www.eu-journal.org/index.php/EJPE/article/view/85

Pathare, S., & Pradhan, H. C. (2011). Students’ alternative conceptions in pressure, heat and temperature. Physics Education, 21(3–4), 213–218. https://www.hbcse.tifr.res.in/episteme/episteme-1/allabs/shirish_abs.pdf

Ratnasari, D., Sukarmin, S., & Suparmi, S. (2017). Effect of problem type toward students’ conceptual understanding level on heat and temperature. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 909(1), 012054. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/909/1/012054

Retnawati, H., Arlinwibowo, J., Wulandari, N., & Pradani, R. (2018). Teachers’ difficulties and strategies in physics teaching and learning that applying mathematics. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(1), 120–135. http://www.scientiasocialis.lt/jbse/?q=node/643

Stylos, G., Sargioti, A., Mavridis, D., & Kotsis, K. T. (2021). Validation of the thermal concept evaluation test for Greek university students’ misconceptions of thermal concepts. International Journal of Science Education, 43(2), 247–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1865587

Tatar, E., & Oktay, M. (2011). The effectiveness of problem-based learning on teaching the first law of thermodynamics. Research in Science & Technological Education, 29(3), 315–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2011.599318

Thomaz, M. F., Malaquias, I. M., Valente, M. C., & Antunes, M. J. (1993). Case study of a sixth grade class: Attitudes and conceptions of the marine environment. Third International Seminar on Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics.

Wiser, M., & Kipman, D. (1988). The differentiation of heat and temperature: an evaluation of the effect of microcomputer models on students’ misconceptions. ETC-TR-88-20

Xie, C. (2012). Interactive heat transfer simulations for everyone. The Physics Teacher, 50(4), 237–240. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.3694080

Zacharia, Z. C., & Constantinou, C. P. (2008). Comparing the influence of physical and virtual manipulatives in the context of the Physics by Inquiry curriculum: The case of undergraduate students’ conceptual understanding of heat and temperature. American Journal of Physics, 76(4), 425–430. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2885059

Zhang, C., Wang, H., Liu, Y., & Jiang, J. (2018). Investigation and the improvement strategy of the inquiry physics experiment teaching in senior high school. American Journal of Physics and Applications, 6(5), 104. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpa.20180605.11

Zheng, W., Feng, L., Liu, B., Fu, P., Yin, H., & Qiao, J. (2019). Instrument design for digital thermal conductivity measurement. 2019 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/I2MTC.2019.8827026

Downloads

Published

2022-01-31

How to Cite

Erol, M., & Kuzucu, M. E. (2022). Measuring thermal conductivity via basic home equipment. Momentum: Physics Education Journal, 6(1), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.21067/mpej.v6i1.6306

Issue

Section

Articles