Learning basic physics in Pharmacy Study Program with systems thinking skills needed by pharmacy students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21067/mpej.v8i1.8457Keywords:
basic physics, pharmacy, system thinking, basic health physicsAbstract
This research is a preliminary study aimed at analyzing the methods of teaching basic physics applied in the pharmacy program, as well as its implications for the relevance of physics concepts in pharmacy courses and the development of students' system thinking skills. A cross-sectional survey method was used, employing a structured questionnaire based on the Likert scale, involving physics course instructors from private and public universities. The research findings indicate that, although basic physics has significant potential in contributing to the development of the system thinking skills required by pharmacy graduates, challenges in integrating physics concepts with pharmacy courses still exist. The pharmacy curriculum's focus on pharmaceutical and health aspects may overlook students' understanding of basic physics. Therefore, the importance of developing teaching methods and physics laboratory practices that are appropriate for the pharmacy context becomes clearer. This research concluded that there is a need for the development of more suitable learning methods for basic physics courses in the pharmacy program, with an emphasis on developing system thinking skills crucial in the field of health, and the integration of pharmacy laboratories as a learning support. This is expected to enhance the understanding of physics concepts in the pharmacy context and build relevant system thinking skills for graduates of the pharmacy program.
Downloads
References
Algahtani, H., Shirah, B., Bukhari, H., Alkhamisi, H., Ibrahim, B., Subahi, A., & Aldarmahi, A. (2021). Perceptions and attitudes of different healthcare professionals and students toward interprofessional education in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional survey. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 35(3), 476–481.
Allen, D. D., Boyle, C. J., DiPiro, J. T., Scott, S. A., & Maine, L. L. (2020). Advancing our pharmacy reformation-accelerating education and practice transformation: report of the 2019-2020 Argus Commission. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 84(10).
Bao, L., & Koenig, K. (2019). Physics education research for 21st century learning. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1(1), 1–12.
Coccia, M. (2020). The evolution of scientific disciplines in applied sciences: dynamics and empirical properties of experimental physics. Scientometrics, 124(1), 451–487.
Engle, J. P. (2020). Assuring quality in pharmacy education during a time of crisis. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 84(6).
Farmonov, U. (2020). Teaching of physics for students of natural direction with innovation technologies. Физико-ТехнологичеÑкого Образование, 1.
Flynn, A. B., Orgill, M., Ho, F. M., York, S., Matlin, S. A., Constable, D. J. C., & Mahaffy, P. G. (2019). Future directions for systems thinking in chemistry education: Putting the pieces together. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(12), 3000–3005.
Gorbunova, T. N., Papchenko, E. V, Bazhenov, R. I., & Putkina, L. V. (2018). Professional Standards in Engineering Education and Industry 4.0. 638–642.
Kale, C. M., & Babrekar, M. K. (2019). recent trends in classroom teaching for physics subject. Recent Trends in English, Marathi and Hindi, 135.
Khodabandelou, R., Aleebrahim, N., Amoozegar, A., & Mehran, G. (2019). Revisiting three decades of educational research in Iran: A bibliometric analysis. Iranian Journal of Comparative Education, 2(1), 1–21.
Kholikova, D. M. (2021). Development of Innovative Thinking Skills In Higher Education Students. Theoretical & Applied Science, 6, 549–552.
Kraus, S. F., & Krause, E. (2020). Comparison of mathematics and physics education I. Springer.
Laszlo, C. (2020). Quantum management: the practices and science of flourishing enterprise. Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion, 17(4), 301–315.
Liu, P.-Y., Liu, J. H. C., & Ciou, Y.-J. (2021). Competency-oriented concept-based reading curriculum design and assessment. Journal of Education Research, 329, 94–109.
Maerten-Rivera, J. L., Chen, A. M. H., Augustine, J., d’Assalenaux, R., Lee, K. C., Lindsey, C. C., Malcom, D. R., Mauro, L. S., Pavuluri, N., & Rudolph, M. J. (2020). Co-curriculum implementation and assessment in accredited doctor of pharmacy programs. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 84(3).
Marewski, J. N., & Gigerenzer, G. (2022). Heuristic decision making in medicine. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience.
Marušić, M., & Dragojević, A. (2020). Assessing pharmacy students’ scientific reasoning after completing a physics course taught using active-learning methods. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 84(8), 1112–1122. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe7610
Musliman, D. A. N. (2019). Educational governance innovation through implementation of four unesco education pillars. 3rd International Conference on Education Innovation (ICEI 2019), 71–73.
Nguyen, T. T. H., Do, H. T., & Tuong, D. H. (2022). The scientific process of building knowledge in the style of problem-solving teaching in some contents of nuclear physics.
Nunes-da-Cunha, I., & Fernandez-Llimos, F. (2019). Misuse of competencies in pharmacy curriculum: the Spain case study. Indian J Pharmaceut Edu Res, 53(4), 620–628.
Pettersen, A. (2019). Towards competency-oriented mathematics education: An investigation of task demands and teachers’ knowledge of task demands from a competency perspective.
Plack, P. T., Margaret, M., & Scott, R. (2019). Systems thinking in the healthcare professions: A guide for educators and clinicians.
Priscilla, C., & Yudhyarta, D. Y. (2021). Implementasi pilar-pilar pendidikan UNESCO. Asatiza: Jurnal Pendidikan, 2(1), 64–76.
Thapa, P., Bhandari, S. L., & Pathak, S. (2021). Nursing students’ attitude on the practice of e-learning: A cross-sectional survey amid COVID-19 in Nepal. PloS One, 16(6), e0253651.
Vinall, R., Khansari, P., McDowell, J., Ried, L. D., & Kreys, E. (2019). impact of completion of a pre-pharmacy biochemistry course and competency levels in pre-pharmacy courses on pharmacy student performance. Pharmacy, 7(3), 117.
Wang, X., & Cheng, Z. (2020). Cross-sectional studies: strengths, weaknesses, and recommendations. Chest, 158(1), S65–S71.
Williams, B. W., Byrne, P. D., Welindt, D., & Williams, M. V. (2016). Miller’s pyramid and core competency assessment: a study in relationship construct validity. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 36(4), 295–299.
Witheridge, A., Ferns, G., & Scott-Smith, W. (2019). Revisiting Miller’s pyramid in medical education: the gap between traditional assessment and diagnostic reasoning. International Journal of Medical Education, 10, 191.
Zhong, L. (2022). A mixed methods study of student’s engagement in a game-based learning environment. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, 886–888.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Momentum: Physics Education Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Momentum: Physisc Education Journal allows readers to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of its articles and allow readers to use them for any other lawful purpose. 
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The Authors submitting a manuscript do so with the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to Momentum: Physics Education Journal
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
