Analysis of physics learning in elementary schools and the need for professional development: Is STEM education training necessary for elementary school teachers?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21067/mpej.v8i1.9105Keywords:
teacher professional development, STEM education, physic learningAbstract
This study aims to explore pedagogical approaches and students’ engagement during STEM teaching. As many as 215 elementary school teachers in West Java were involved in this research. Those involved consisted of 161 women and 49 men. The majority of teachers have an elementary school teacher education background (87%), 7% have other educational backgrounds (Science Education/Mathematics Education/Social Education/Language Education), and the remaining 6% are in the sciences. The instrument used in this study was a closed questionnaire with 20 items from a Likert scale survey. The results of the study show that 50% of elementary school teachers very rarely use experimental approaches and problem-based learning when teaching STEM content. More than 60% of teachers also very rarely use the inquiry approach in teaching the four contents. The approach that is often used by teachers in teaching STEM is a collaborative and integrated approach. In addition, the survey results also show that more than 50% of students are very rarely involved in inquiry and engineering practice activities when learning about STEM content. The analysis of professional development needs showed that the majority of elementary school teachers have never received a professional development program regarding STEM education. In fact, the majority of teachers have a positive attitude towards the coaching program, which has an impact on increasing their competence. Apart from that, the results of this research also show that there is a lack of external support (from universities, educational practitioners, and researchers) for teachers in coaching programs. These findings provide evidence that teachers still need to receive training on pedagogical approaches that are relevant to integrated STEM education. The existence of training on STEM education is expected to improve the quality of STEM learning in the classroom. Thus, students' involvement in scientific and engineering practice when learning STEM becomes more dominant.
Downloads
References
Ardianto, D., Rubini, B., & Pursitasari, I. D. (2021). Analisis Literasi dan Minat STEM Siswa di Kota Bogor dan Kabupaten Cianjur. [Laporan Penelitian]. Universitas Pakuan.
Bidang Pengelolaan Data Ketenagakerjaan. (2021). Ketenagakerjaan Dalam Data (4th ed.). Pusat Data dan Teknologi Informasi Ketenagakerjaan.
Brown, R. E., & Bogiages, C. A. (2019). Professional Development Through STEM Integration: How Early Career Math and Science Teachers Respond to Experiencing Integrated STEM Tasks. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(1), 111–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9863-x
Buczynski, S., & Hansen, C. B. (2010). Impact of professional development on teacher practice: Uncovering connections. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(3), 599–607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.09.006
Cavlazoglu, B., & Stuessy, C. (2017). Changes in science teachers’ conceptions and connections of STEM concepts and earthquake engineering. The Journal of Educational Research, 110, 239–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2016.1273176
Chai, C. S. (2019). Teacher Professional Development for Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Education: A Review from the Perspectives of Technological Pedagogical Content (TPACK). The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 28(1), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-018-0400-7
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective Teacher Professional Development. Learning Policy Institute. https://doi.org/10.54300/122.311
Direktorat Statistik Kependudukan dan Ketenagakerjaan. (2022). Booklet Survey Angkatan Kerja Nasional Agustus 2022. Badan Pusat Statistik Republik Indonesia.
Doppelt, Y., Schunn, C. D., Silk, E. M., Mehalik, M. M., Reynolds, B., & Ward, E. (2009). Evaluating the impact of a facilitated learning community approach to professional development on teacher practice and student achievement. Research in Science & Technological Education, 27(3), 339–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635140903166026
Faber, C., Hardin, E., Klein-Gardner, S., & Benson, L. (2014). Development of Teachers as Scientists in Research Experiences for Teachers Programs. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25, 785–806. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9400-5
Firman, H. (2015). Pendidikan STEM. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan IPA Dan PKLH, 1–9.
Fore, G. A., Feldhaus, C. R., Sorge, B. H., Agarwal, M., & Varahramyan, K. (2015). Learning at the nano-level: Accounting for complexity in the internalization of secondary STEM teacher professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies, 51(1), 101–112.
Guzey, S. S., Harwell, M., & Moore, T. (2014). Development of an Instrument to Assess Attitudes Toward Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM). School Science and Mathematics, 114(6), 271–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12077
Hall, A., & Miro, D. (2016). A Study of Student Engagement in Projectâ€Based Learning Across Multiple Approaches to STEM Education Programs. School Science and Mathematics, 116(6), 310–319. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12182
Ismail, M. H. (2022). A Needs Analysis Study for the Preparation of Integrated STEM Instructional Practices through Scientist-Teacher-Student Partnership (STSP). ASM Science Journal, null, null. https://doi.org/10.32802/asmscj.2022.1112
Johnson, C. C., & Fargo, J. D. (2014). A Study of the Impact of Transformative Professional Development on Hispanic Student Performance on State Mandated Assessments of Science in Elementary School. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(7), 845–859. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9396-x
Kennedy, T. J., & Odell, M. R. L. (2014). Engaging Students In STEM Education.
Lara-Alecio, R., Tong, F., Irby, B. J., Guerrero, C., Huerta, M., & Fan, Y. (2012). The effect of an instructional intervention on middle school english learners’ science and english reading achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(8), 987–1011. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21031
Luo, W., Wei, H.-R., Ritzhaupt, A. D., Huggins-Manley, A. C., & Gardner-McCune, C. (2019). Using the S-STEM Survey to Evaluate a Middle School Robotics Learning Environment: Validity Evidence in a Different Context. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 28(4), 429–443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-019-09773-z
Nadelson, L. S., Callahan, J., Pyke, P., Hay, A., Dance, M., & Pfiester, J. (2013). Teacher STEM Perception and Preparation: Inquiry-Based STEM Professional Development for Elementary Teachers. The Journal of Educational Research, 106(2), 157–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2012.667014
National Research Council. (2012). A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas (p. 13165). National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13165
OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 Results in Focus (p. 44). Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).
OECD. (2018). PISA 2015: Results in Focus (p. 32). Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).
Parker, C. E., Stylinski, C. D., Bonney, C. R., Schillaci, R., & McAuliffe, C. (2015). Examining the Quality of Technology Implementation in STEM Classrooms: Demonstration of an Evaluative Framework. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 47(2), 105–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2015.999640
Penuel, W. R., Gallagher, L. P., & Moorthy, S. (2011). Preparing Teachers to Design Sequences of Instruction in Earth Systems Science: A Comparison of Three Professional Development Programs. American Educational Research Journal, 48(4), 996–1025. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831211410864
Postholm, M. B. (2018). Teachers’ professional development in school: A review study. Cogent Education, 5(1), 1522781. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1522781
Radloff, J., & Guzey, S. (2017). Investigating Changes in Preservice Teachers’ Conceptions of STEM Education Following Video Analysis and Reflection: STEM Conceptions Following Video Reflection. School Science and Mathematics, 117(3–4), 158–167. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12218
Richmond, G., Dershimer, R. C., Ferreira, M., Maylone, N., Kubitskey, B., & Meriweather, A. (2017). Developing and sustaining an educative mentoring model of STEM teacher professional development through collaborative partnership. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 25(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2017.1308097
Rubini, B., Pursitasari, I. D., Ardianto, D., & Hidayat, A. (2018). Science Teachers’ Understanding on Science Literacy and Integrated Science Learning: Lesson from Teachers Training. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i3.11443
Sadler, P., Sonnert, G., Hazari, Z., & Tai, R. (2012). Stability and Volatility of STEM Career Interest in High School: A Gender Study. Science Education, 96, 411–427. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21007
Salami, M. A. A., Makela, C., & Miranda, M. A. (2017). Assessing changes in teachers’ attitudes toward interdisciplinary STEM teaching. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 27, 63–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10798-015-9341-0
Sjaastad, J. (2013). Measuring the Ways Significant Persons Influence Attitudes Towards Science and Mathematics. International Journal of Science Education, 35(2), 192–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.672775
Struyf, A., De Loof, H., Boeve-de Pauw, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2019). Students’ engagement in different STEM learning environments: Integrated STEM education as promising practice? International Journal of Science Education, 41(10), 1387–1407. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1607983
Sulaeman, N. F., Putra, P. D. A., Mineta, I., Hakamada, H., Takahashi, M., Ide, Y., & Kumano, Y. (2021). Exploring Student Engagement in STEM Education through the Engineering Design Process. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran IPA, 7(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.30870/jppi.v7i1.10455
Tyler-Wood, T., Knezek, G., & Christensen, R. (2010). Instruments for Assessing Interest in STEM Content and Careers. 18(2), 341–363.
Vangrieken, K., Dochy, F., Raes, E., & Kyndt, E. (2015). Teacher collaboration: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 15, 17–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.04.002
Wagner, T. P., McCormick, K., & Martinez, D. M. (2017). Fostering STEM literacy through a tabletop wind turbine environmental science laboratory activity. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 7(2), 230–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-015-0337-6
Yoon, K. S. (2007). Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Southwest.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Momentum: Physics Education Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Momentum: Physisc Education Journal allows readers to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of its articles and allow readers to use them for any other lawful purpose. 
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The Authors submitting a manuscript do so with the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to Momentum: Physics Education Journal
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
