Identification of mental model and prediction of class XII high school students on the topic of convection heat transfer
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21067/mpej.v8i2.9537Keywords:
Mental Model, Prediction, Convection Heat TransferAbstract
Mental models have an important role in the learning process because learning in general can be seen as mental modeling. The purpose of this study is to identify students' mental models and identify the relationship between mental models and prediction ability on the topic of convection heat transfer. The sample of this study was 15 on 12th-grade high school students, 8 male students and 7 female students. The students came from three different schools, namely from Tasikmalaya district, Ciamis district, and Banjar City. Sampling was done by purposive sampling with the characteristics of students who have studied heat and students who have high cognitive process abilities in their respective schools. Data collection was done by semi-structured interviews with the type of questions in the form of content and prediction. Data analysis is done by constant comparative method. The results of this study show that there are no students who have a scientific mental model. Five types of mental models were found, including unclear model, convection is a continuation of conduction, convection that does not change density, convection for evaporation, and model 3. In addition, the relationship between prediction and mental model was classified as complex. This is due to students who predict without using their mental models. Knowing the diverse mental models of students, educators become more knowledgeable about the level of representation of each student. So that educators can prepare appropriate learning strategies in order to construct students' mental models.
Downloads
References
Amalia, R., Sari, I. M., & Sinaga, P. (2017). Students’ mental model on heat convection concept and its relation with students conception on heat and temperature. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 812, 012092. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/812/1/012092
Bryce, T. G. K., & Blown, E. J. (2016). Manipulating Models and Grasping the Ideas They Represent. Science & Education, 25(1–2), 47–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-015-9802-6
Chiou, G., & Anderson, O. R. (2010). A study of undergraduate physics students’ understanding of heat conduction based on mental model theory and an ontology–process analysis. Science Education, 94(5), 825–854. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20385
Chiou, G.-L. (2013). Reappraising the relationships between physics students’ mental models and predictions: An example of heat convection. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 9(1), 010119. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.9.010119
Dauer, J. T., Bergan-Roller, H. E., King, G. P., Kjose, M., Galt, N. J., & Helikar, T. (2019). Changes in students’ mental models from computational modeling of gene regulatory networks. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0193-0
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2013). Mental models and cognitive change. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25(2), 131–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2012.759935
Karo-Karo, E. K., Sari, I. M., & Suwarma, I. R. (2021). INVESTIGASI MODEL MENTAL KONDUKSI KALOR SISWA SMA. Journal of Teaching and Learning Physics, 6(1), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.15575/jotalp.v6i1.10987
Kokkonen, T. (2017). Models as Relational Categories. Science & Education, 26(7–9), 777–798. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-017-9928-9
Kraus, S. F. (2023). The Method of Observation in Science Education: Characteristic Dimensions from an Educational Perspective. Science & Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-023-00422-x
Krebs, M.-C., Schüler, A., & Scheiter, K. (2021). Do prior knowledge, model-observer similarity and social comparison influence the effectiveness of eye movement modeling examples for supporting multimedia learning? Instructional Science, 49(5), 607–635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-021-09552-7
Lehmann, T., Pirnay-Dummer, P., & Schmidt-Borcherding, F. (2020). Fostering integrated mental models of different professional knowledge domains: Instructional approaches and model-based analyses. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(3), 905–927. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09704-0
Masrifah, M., & Amiroh, D. (2023). The multi-representational ability profile of physics students in the interactive multimedia assisted problem-based learning during the Covid-19 pandemic. Momentum: Physics Education Journal, 7(2), 188–200. https://doi.org/10.21067/mpej.v7i2.7501
Priyadi, R., Diantoro, M., Parno, P., & Helmi, H. (2019). An Exploration of Students’ Mental Models on Heat and Temperature: A Preliminary Study. Jurnal Penelitian Fisika Dan Aplikasinya (JPFA), 9(2), 114. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpfa.v9n2.p114-122
Sari, I. M. (2017). What do they know about Heat and Heat Conduction? A case study to excavate Pre-service Physics Teachers’ Mental Model in Heat and Heat Conduction. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 812, 012090. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/812/1/012090
Sari, I. M., & Saepuzzaman, D. (2016). Physics Students’ Mental Model and Prediction in Heat Convection Concept. Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Innovation in Engineering and Vocational Education. 2015 International Conference on Innovation in Engineering and Vocational Education, Bandung, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.2991/icieve-15.2016.48
Shepardson, D. P., Choi, S., Niyogi, D., & Charusombat, U. (2011). Seventh grade students’ mental models of the greenhouse effect. Environmental Education Research, 17(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620903564549
Venkateshan, S. P. (2021). Heat Transfer. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58338-5
Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. F. (1992). Mental models of the earth: A study of conceptual change in childhood. Cognitive Psychology, 24(4), 535–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(92)90018-W
Wahyuni, B., Zainuddin, Z., Misbah, M., & Murshed, M. B. (2024). Character-based physics learning module through generative learning model: Student conceptual understanding. Journal of Environment and Sustainability Education, 2(1), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.62672/joease.v2i1.15
Zuccarini, G., & Malgieri, M. (2022). Modeling and Representing Conceptual Change in the Learning of Successive Theories: The Case of the Classical-Quantum Transition. Science & Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00397-1
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Momentum: Physics Education Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Momentum: Physisc Education Journal allows readers to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of its articles and allow readers to use them for any other lawful purpose.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The Authors submitting a manuscript do so with the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to Momentum: Physics Education Journal