Pendidikan IPS Berperspektif Global dan Civic Engagement Siswa SMP

Sebuah Kajian Konseptual

Authors

  • Sigit Triyono Program Doktor Pendidikan Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial, Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, Banjarmasin, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21067/jppi.v20i2.13574

Keywords:

Social Studies, global perspective, civic engagement, global citizenship, lower-secondary students

Abstract

This article aims to formulate a globally oriented Social Studies framework to support the civic engagement of lower-secondary students. The conceptual-narrative review uses nine substantive sources selected purposively through targeted web searches during revision. Sources were selected for their relevance to global citizenship education, Social Studies inquiry, critical citizenship, or adolescent civic engagement. Extraction distinguished conceptual arguments, pedagogical guidance, and empirical findings; analysis linked source propositions to codes, categories, and four themes. Reading depth depended on accessible material, including the abstract and author summary for one digital study. The synthesis identifies four themes: local and global interconnectedness; context-sensitive global citizenship; critical dialogue across knowledge perspectives; and participation through action and digital media. The proposed framework separates knowledge, attitudes, and intentions as enabling elements from dialogue, collective decisions, and action as observable forms of engagement. Digital spaces are treated as media across activities rather than a separate outcome dimension. Pedagogical implications are illustrated through a proposed five-session project on school packaging waste, a packaging-tracing task, a portfolio, and an analytic rubric with aspect-specific descriptors. The review concludes that a global perspective can inform Social Studies designs connecting issue analysis with action for the common good, provided that students have meaningful choices and equitable access. This relationship is a conceptual proposition rather than evidence of increased student engagement. Limitations include non-exhaustive source selection, variation in source contexts and accessibility, and the absence of framework testing in Indonesian schools.

References

Andreotti, V. (2006). Soft versus critical global citizenship education. Policy & Practice: A Development Education Review, 3, 40–51. Retrieved from https://www.developmenteducationreview.com/issue/issue-3/soft-versus-critical-global-citizenship-education

Bowyer, B., & Kahne, J. (2020). The digital dimensions of civic education: Assessing the effects of learning opportunities. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 69, 101162. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2020.101162

Dakhalan, A. M., & Kuswandi, D. (2024). Pendidikan kewarganegaraan global (GCE). Madika: Jurnal Politik dan Governance, 4(2), 158–171. Retrieved from https://jurnal.iainpalu.ac.id/index.php/madika/article/download/3413/1775/

Holilah, M., Kuswati, E., & Sulaemat, E. (2025). Panduan mata pelajaran ilmu pengetahuan sosial (IPS). Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan, Kementerian Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Retrieved from https://kurikulum.kemendikdasmen.go.id/file/panduan/dokumen/12.%20Final%20Panduan%20Mata%20Pelajaran%20IPS_12_09_2025_Revisi%203.pdf

Kahne, J. E., & Sporte, S. E. (2008). Developing citizens: The impact of civic learning opportunities on students’ commitment to civic participation. American Educational Research Journal, 45(3), 738–766. doi:10.3102/0002831208316951

National Council for the Social Studies. (2013). The college, career, and civic life (C3) framework for social studies state standards: Guidance for enhancing the rigor of K–12 civics, economics, geography, and history. Silver Spring, MD: Author. Retrieved from https://www.socialstudies.org/standards/c3

Schulz, W., Ainley, J., Fraillon, J., Losito, B., Agrusti, G., Damiani, V., & Friedman, T. (2023). Education for citizenship in times of global challenge: IEA International Civic and Citizenship Education Study 2022 international report (Revised ed.). International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. Retrieved from https://www.iea.nl/sites/default/files/2024-02/ICCS-2022-International-Report-Revised.pdf

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

UNESCO. (2015). Global citizenship education: Topics and learning objectives. Paris, France: Author. Retrieved from https://www.unesco.org/sites/default/files/gcedtopicsandlearningobjectives_01.pdf

UNESCO. (2024). Global citizenship education in a digital age: Teacher guidelines. Paris, France: Author. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000388812

Westheimer, J., & Kahne, J. (2004). What kind of citizen? The politics of educating for democracy. American Educational Research Journal, 41(2), 237–269. doi:10.3102/00028312041002237

Downloads

Published

2026-10-31

How to Cite

Triyono, S. (2026). Pendidikan IPS Berperspektif Global dan Civic Engagement Siswa SMP: Sebuah Kajian Konseptual. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pendidikan IPS, 20(2), 118–129. https://doi.org/10.21067/jppi.v20i2.13574