THE EFFECTIVENESS OF DIRECT PEER FEEDBACK TO INCREASE STUDENTS’ WRITING PERFORMANCE SUJITO (CORRESPONDING AUTHOR)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21067/jibs.v4i1.1948Kata Kunci:
performance, peer feedbackAbstrak
This study intended to investigate if there was any significant difference between students’ writing performance who were treated using direct peer feedback and students writing performance who were treated using conventional method. The samples were X TKJ1 and X TKJ2 at SMK Mahardika Karangploso in the 2015/2016 academic year. In this study, the researcher used quasi-experimental research design to gain the data. The researcher implemented direct peer feedback in experimental group and conventional method in control group. Writing test as an instrument was used to collect the data. The research was conducted by the researcher for six meetings. Independent sample t-test was used to examine the data, the result showed that the mean score of experimental group was bigger than control group (82.17 > 71.38). Moreover, the sig.2-tailed value was less than 0.05 (0.000 < 0.05). It meant that there was significant differences between students’ writing performance who were treated using direct peer feedback and students’ writing performance who were treated using conventional method.
Referensi
Alawi, F.F. 2012. Improving students’ ability in writing descriptive text using clustering technique ( an action research at eihth grades OF Mts. Darul Ma’arif cipete-jakarta). Unpublished Thesis. Jakarta: Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teachers Training UIN Syarif Hidayatullah.
Alwasilah, A.C and Alwasilah, S.S. 2005. Pokoknya Menulis: Cara Baru Menulis dengan Metode Kolaborasi. Bandung: PT Kiblat Buku Utama.
Amaliah, Rizki. 2012. The Effectiveness of Peer Feedback in Improving Writing Skill of First Grade Students in Junior High School in Writing Descriptive Text. Unpublished Thesis. Jakarta: Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teachers Training UIN Syarif Hidayatullah.
Barkaoui, K. 2007. Revision in Second Language Writing: What Teachers Need to Know. TESL Canada Journal, 25(1): 81-92.
Bello, T. 1997. Writing Topics for Adult ESL Students. Paper presented at the 31st Annual Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Language Convention, Orlando, FI, USA.
Birk,A. 2007. An Explorationof the Role of Grammatical Feedback by Peers on EssayWriting in the Advanced English Language Learners’ Classroom.Unpublished Thesis. Hamlin University.
Calkins, L. Cormick,Mc. 1986.The Art of Teaching Writing(1st ed).Partsouth: Heinemann.
Carnell, E. 2000. Dialogue, discussion and secondary school students on how others help theirlearning, in Askew (ed.),Feedback for Learning. London: Routledge, 46-61.
Carrol, R.t. 2005. Student Success Guide-Writing Skill. (online),(http://skepdic.com/refuge/writingskills.pdf), accessed on January 07.
Detapratiwi, R. 2013. The Impact Of Team Pair Solo Technique And Round Robin Technique On Students’ Ability In Writing Descriptive Text. ELT Forum, 2(2),4.
Ellis, R. 2008. A typology of written corrective feedback types. ELT Journal, 64(10), 98-100.
Gebhard, J. G. 1996. Teaching English as a Foreign or Second Language: A Teacher Self-Development an Methodology Guide.Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
Hairston, Maxine C. 1999. Contemporary Composition(4th ed.). Boston :Houghton Mifflin company.
Haoucha, M. 2012. The Role of Peer Feedback, Teacher Written and Taped Commentary in Enhancing Revision and Improving Text Quality. International Journal of Arts & Sciences, 5(5), 85-87.
Hashemnezhad, H. 2012. A Case for Direct and Indirect Feedback: The Other Side of Coin. English Language Teaching, 5 (3), 235-236.
Lenggogeni, Putri. 2011. The Use of Peer Feedback Technique in Improving Students’ Narrative Writing.Unpublished.
Liu, J., &Hansen, J. 2005. Peer response in second language writing classrooms.Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Nuraeni .2013. The Effectiveness Of Peer-Assessment Trough Facebook Towards Students’ Writing Skill in Narrative Text.Unpublished Thesis. Jakarta: Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University.
Qomariyah.S. 2010. The Implementation Of Peer Assessment In Improving Students’ Reading Ability In Descriptive Text At Seventh Grade Students of MTs Husnaba Kebandingan.Unpublished Thesis. Tegal: Pancasakti University.
Rasana. 2004. Keefektifitasan Model Pembelajaran Konvensional di SMA Negeri 01 Bandung,(Online),(http://www.keefektifitasanmodelpembelajarankonvensional.com//paperinfo.aspx? =501&doi=10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020501.12), accessed on April 25th, 2015.
Rollinson,P. 2005. Using Peer Feedback in the ESL writing Class.ELT journal, V.59, n.1. p.23-30.
Shulin, Y. 2013. EFL Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices regarding Peer Feedback in L2 Writing Classrooms. Polyglossia, 24, 75-78.
Spear, R. 1988. Sharing writing: Peer response groups in English classes. Portsmouth, NH:Poynton/Cook.
Topping, K. J. 2007. Trends in peer learning. Educational Psychology, 25(6), 631-645.
White, R., & Arndt, V. 1991. New Ways in Teaching Writing. USA: Cambridge University Press.
Wichadee, S. 2010. The impact of peer review on students’ writing ability in an EFL class. Proceeding of The 1stNational Conference on Applied Arts (NCAA 2010). King Mongkut’s University of Technology North Bangkok
Williams, J.G. 2005. Providing Feedback on ESL Students’ WrittenAssignments, (Online),(http://iteslj.org/techniques/williams-feedback.html), accessed on April 25th, 2015.
Zaman, M. 2012.Feedback in EFL Writing at Tertiary Level: Teachers' and Learners' Perceptions. ASA University Review, 6 (1), 144-147.
Zeqiri, Luiza. 2011. The Role of Peer Feedback in Developing Better Writing Skills.(Online),(http://www.seeu.edu.mk/en/~l.zeqiri), accessed on April 25th, 2015
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
JIBS (Jurnal Ilmiah Bahasa dan Sastra) allows readers to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of its articles and allow readers to use them for any other lawful purpose. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions. Finally, the journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic License.