Posing Arithmetic Problems for Junior High School Students with Different Cognitive Styles

Authors

  • Aminatul Lailiyah Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Agung Lukito Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Siti Khabibah Universitas Negeri Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21067/pmej.v6i1.8395

Keywords:

Problem Posing, Arithmetic, Cognitive Style, Field Dependent, Field Independent

Abstract

This study aims to describe the process of posing arithmetic problems for junior high school students with different cognitive styles. The posed problems were assessed based on four processes of posing problems: editing, selecting, comprehending, and translating. Free-type problem posing was used in this study. This study is descriptive research with a qualitative approach. Subject selection was conducted by providing TKM, GEFT, and BSRI. Data collection was conducted through written task and task-based interviews. The subject was two junior high school students. One has Field Dependent (FD) cognitive style, and the other is Field Independent (FI), measured by GEFT. Furthermore, the data were analyzed based on the four processes of posing problems. The results showed that posing arithmetic problems for FI students fulfilled all four processes of posing problems, and posing arithmetic problems for FD students fulfilled three processes for posing problems. In general, the problems raised by the two subjects were problems the subject had encountered or experienced. FD students can pose more problems than FI students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Agung Lukito, Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Pascasarjana Pendidikan Matematika, Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Siti Khabibah, Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Pascasarjana Pendidikan Matematika, Universitas Negeri Surabaya

References

Anim, A., Prasetyo, Y. D., & Rahmadani, E. (2019). Experimentation of Problem Posing Learning Model Assisted of Autograph Software to Students’ Mathematical Communication Ability in Terms of Student’s Gender. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 7(2), 331-342. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v7i2.301

Arikan, E. E., & Unal, H. (2014). Development of the structured problem posing skills and using metaphoric perceptions. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(3),155-166.

Azlina, N., Amin, S. M., & Lukito, A. (2018). Creativity of Field-dependent and Field-independent Students in Posing Mathematical Problems. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 947(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/947/1/012031

Baumanns, L., & Rott, B. (2022). The process of problem posing: development of a descriptive phase model of problem posing. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 110(2), 251–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10136-y

Christou, C., Mousoulides, N., Pittalis, M., Pitta-Pantazi, D., & Sriraman, B. (2005). An empirical taxonomy of problem posing processes. ZDM. 37(3).

Chu, Y-C. (2008). Learning Difficulties in Genetics and the Development of Related Attitudes in Taiwanese Junior High Schools. (Disertasi) University Glasgow United Kingdom. Retrieved from http://theses.gla.ac.uk/id/eprint/168

Georgiev V, & Nedyalkova V. (2011). Group Creativity and Development Of Mathematical Problem Posing And Solving Capabilities. Pisa: University of Pisa.

M. Thobroni. (2015). Belajar dan Pembelajaran: Teori dan Praktek. Yogjakarta: Arr-Ruzz Media

NCTM. (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. United States of America: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc.

Nicolaou, A., & Xistouri, X. (2011). Field dependence/independence cognitive style and problem posing: An investigation with sixth grade students. Educational Psychology, 31(5), 611–627. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2011.586126

Novianti, A. W., Sadieda, L. U., & Suparto, S. (2020). Kompleksitas Soal dalam Pengajuan Masalah Tipe Post Solution Posing Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif Siswa. Jurnal Review Pembelajaran Matematika, 5(1), 14–29. https://doi.org/10.15642/jrpm.2020.5.1.14-29

Nuraida et al. (2022). Students Mathematic Problem Solving Process in Two Variable Linear Equation Systems from Cognitive Field Dependent Style. Indonesia Mathematics Education. 5(1). https://indomath.org/index.php/

Patac, A.V., et al. (2022). Students’ understanding of a geometric theorem: A case of grade 9 problem posing. Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education. 7(2). 105-115. DOI: 10.23917/jramathedu.v7i2.16394.

Rahman, A., & Ahmar, A. S. (2017). Problem Posing of High School Mathematics Student’s Based on Their Cognitive Style. Educational Process: International Journal, 6(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2017.61.1.

Singer, F. M., Voica, C., & Pelczer, I. (2017). Cognitive styles in posing geometry problems: implications for assessment of mathematical creativity. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 49(1), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0820-x.

Siswono, Y.E.T (2018). Pembelajaran Matematika Berbasis Pengajuan dan Pemecahan Masalah. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Ulya, H., & Retnoningsih, A. (2014). Analysis Of Mathematics Problem Solving Ability Of Junior High School Students Viewed From Students’ Cognitive Style. In International Journal of Education and Research. 2(10). www.ijern.com.

Downloads

Published

2023-05-11

How to Cite

Aminatul Lailiyah, Agung Lukito, & Siti Khabibah. (2023). Posing Arithmetic Problems for Junior High School Students with Different Cognitive Styles. Pi: Mathematics Education Journal, 6(1), 56–66. https://doi.org/10.21067/pmej.v6i1.8395

Issue

Section

Articles